Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-4711

Hartmann, B; Ahmadi, S; Heppenstall, P A; Lewin, G R; Schott, C; Borchardt, T; Seeburg, P H; Zeilhofer, H U; Sprengel, R; Kuner, R (2004). The AMPA receptor subunits GluR-A and GluR-B reciprocally modulate spinal synaptic plasticity and inflammatory pain. Neuron, 44(4):637-650.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
1MB

Abstract

Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors are densely expressed in the spinal dorsal horn, but their functional significance in pain processing is not understood. By disrupting the genes encoding GluR-A or GluR-B, we generated mice exhibiting increased or decreased numbers of Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors, respectively. Here, we demonstrate that AMPA receptors are critical determinants of nociceptive plasticity and inflammatory pain. A reduction in the number of Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors and density of AMPA channel currents in spinal neurons of GluR-A-deficient mice is accompanied by a loss of nociceptive plasticity in vitro and a reduction in acute inflammatory hyperalgesia in vivo. In contrast, an increase in spinal Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors in GluR-B-deficient mice facilitated nociceptive plasticity and enhanced long-lasting inflammatory hyperalgesia. Thus, AMPA receptors are not mere determinants of fast synaptic transmission underlying basal pain sensitivity as previously thought, but are critically involved in activity-dependent changes in synaptic processing of nociceptive inputs.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology
DDC:570 Life sciences; biology
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:18 November 2004
Deposited On:27 Mar 2009 11:27
Last Modified:28 Nov 2013 02:12
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0896-6273
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.029
PubMed ID:15541312
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 95
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 100

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page