Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-47823

Dagron, Stéphanie (2011). Die demokratische Legitimation des französischen nationalen Ethikrates. Die Verwaltung: Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht und Verwaltungswissenschaften, 2011(1):1-40.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
1MB

Abstract

The French National Consultative Ethics Committee on Health and Life Sciences (Comité consultatif national d'éthique, CCNE) was created in 1983. It is the oldest national ethics committee in Europe. Its task is to prepare advisory opinions and make recommendations about “ethical problems and societal issues raised by progress in the fields of biology, medicine and health”. The Committee was recognized by the legislator as an independent public body in 2004. It has written more than 100 opinions and recommendations in 27 years.

This paper examines the fundamental question whether the democratic legitimacy of the CCNE is adequate with respect to its role. On the one hand, this empirical analysis addresses the activities of the Committee, revealing that it exercises a real normative influence on the decision-making process in the field of biomedicine. The work of the Ethics Committee is an important source of inspiration for the legislator, as well as for judges and for public organizations acting in the fields of medicine, biology and health. On the other hand, the analysis focuses on the formal elements of the Committee's democratic legitimacy, as well as on alternative elements important for the legitimacy of independent public bodies in the French system. The analysis indicates that the material legitimacy of the CCNE is insufficient because its advisory opinions often go far beyond the designated legal task. That being said, the independence of the Committee should not be interpreted as a democratic deficiency. In fact, the independence of the CCNE is essential for the successful realization of its purpose. Indeed, the analysis indicates that the Committee was effective in developing independent positions on bioethical issues. So far, the CCNE's primary inadequacy, however, has been its failure to integrate the larger public in discussions of these issues.

Item Type:Journal Article, not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:01 Faculty of Theology > Center for Ethics
04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Ethics
DDC:170 Ethics
610 Medicine & health
Language:German
Date:March 2011
Deposited On:30 Mar 2011 14:34
Last Modified:23 Nov 2012 15:07
Publisher:Duncker und Humblot GmbH
ISSN:0042-4498
Publisher DOI:10.3790/verw.44.1.1
Related URLs:http://www.duncker-humblot.de/?cmd=1002&mnu=1000&tid=1&pid=3 (Publisher)
Citations:Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page