UZH-Logo

Escitalopram in clinical practice


Holsboer-Trachsler, E; Baumann, P; Höck, P; Hättenschwiler, J; Jost, M; Ramseier, F; Seifritz, E; Nil, R (2011). Escitalopram in clinical practice. Psychopharmakotherapie, 18(2):59-65.

Abstract

Evidence of efficacy of new drugs is based on clinical studies which include highly selected patient samples. The aim of the present observational study was to verify the findings of clinical escitalopram studies in depression and anxiety with a large and heterogenous patient sample. By means of a simple questionnaire, 626 general practitioners and psychiatrists in private practices from Switzerland documented the course of illness over about 6 weeks in patients for whom a treatment with escitalopram was intended. The questionnaire included information on demographics, severity of illness and related disabilities in daily life, treatment efficacy and tolerability, as well as a rating on the subjectively most disturbing symptom, time to onset of effect and remission. The sample included 5 649 patients of whom 2/3 were female. 4 282 patients were diagnosed as suffering from depression, 539 from anxiety, and 708 from both depression and anxiety (no information available for 120 patients). “Depressive mood” was rated the most disturbing symptom among the depressive and comorbid patients and “inner tension” was the most disturbing symptom among the anxiety patients. The comorbid patient sample was most often rated as being severely ill (34 % vs. 18 % [anxiety patients] and 19 % [depression patients]), had most often received a previous pharmacological treatment (43 % vs. 26 % and 31 %, respectively) and was most often treated with the higher dose of 20 mg/d escitalopram (34 % vs. 22 % and 19 %, respectively). Treatment outcome was equal between the diagnostic groups and reached values of over 80 % for the ratings “good” or “very good”. Remission was achieved in 52 % of the patients. The average time until patients reported onset of effect was 14 days, and time until remission was stated as early as 24 days. Interestingly, patients achieving remission reported a better tolerability than patients who did not achieve remission. The analysis of adverse events revealed the same profile, albeit with lower frequencies, for side effects as is reported in the product information. No as of yet unknown adverse events were reported. The present evaluation confirmed the clinical profile of escitalopram as it is reported from clinical studies. It became evident that observational studies of this scale may also generate interesting general information such as subjective feelings of patients, the time course of the illness during treatment, and the time at which a change of therapy should be considered in the event of an unsatisfactory response.

Evidence of efficacy of new drugs is based on clinical studies which include highly selected patient samples. The aim of the present observational study was to verify the findings of clinical escitalopram studies in depression and anxiety with a large and heterogenous patient sample. By means of a simple questionnaire, 626 general practitioners and psychiatrists in private practices from Switzerland documented the course of illness over about 6 weeks in patients for whom a treatment with escitalopram was intended. The questionnaire included information on demographics, severity of illness and related disabilities in daily life, treatment efficacy and tolerability, as well as a rating on the subjectively most disturbing symptom, time to onset of effect and remission. The sample included 5 649 patients of whom 2/3 were female. 4 282 patients were diagnosed as suffering from depression, 539 from anxiety, and 708 from both depression and anxiety (no information available for 120 patients). “Depressive mood” was rated the most disturbing symptom among the depressive and comorbid patients and “inner tension” was the most disturbing symptom among the anxiety patients. The comorbid patient sample was most often rated as being severely ill (34 % vs. 18 % [anxiety patients] and 19 % [depression patients]), had most often received a previous pharmacological treatment (43 % vs. 26 % and 31 %, respectively) and was most often treated with the higher dose of 20 mg/d escitalopram (34 % vs. 22 % and 19 %, respectively). Treatment outcome was equal between the diagnostic groups and reached values of over 80 % for the ratings “good” or “very good”. Remission was achieved in 52 % of the patients. The average time until patients reported onset of effect was 14 days, and time until remission was stated as early as 24 days. Interestingly, patients achieving remission reported a better tolerability than patients who did not achieve remission. The analysis of adverse events revealed the same profile, albeit with lower frequencies, for side effects as is reported in the product information. No as of yet unknown adverse events were reported. The present evaluation confirmed the clinical profile of escitalopram as it is reported from clinical studies. It became evident that observational studies of this scale may also generate interesting general information such as subjective feelings of patients, the time course of the illness during treatment, and the time at which a change of therapy should be considered in the event of an unsatisfactory response.

Citations

2 citations in Web of Science®
1 citation in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Additional indexing

Other titles:Escitalopram in der klinischen Praxis
Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:12 May 2011 14:42
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:54
Publisher:Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft
ISSN:0944-6877

Download

Full text not available from this repository.

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations