UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning


Jousset, A; Schmid, B; Scheu, S; Eisenhauer, N (2011). Genotypic richness and dissimilarity opposingly affect ecosystem functioning. Ecology Letters, 14(6):537-545.

Abstract

Biodiversity is an essential determinant of ecosystem functioning. Numerous studies described positive effects
of diversity on the functioning of communities arising from complementary resource use and facilitation. However, high biodiversity may also increase competitive interactions, fostering antagonism and negatively affecting community performance. Using experimental bacterial communities we differentiated diversity effects based on genotypic richness and dissimilarity. We show that these diversity characteristics have opposite effects on ecosystem functioning. Genotypic dissimilarity governed complementary resource use, improving ecosystem functioning in complex resource environments. Contrastingly, genotypic richness drove allelopathic interactions, mostly reducing ecosystem functioning. The net biodiversity effect on community performance resulted from the interplay between the genetic structure of the community and resource complexity. These
results demonstrate that increasing richness, without concomitantly increasing dissimilarity, can decrease
ecosystem functioning in simple environments due to antagonistic interactions, an effect insufficiently
considered so far in mechanistic models of the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationship.

Abstract

Biodiversity is an essential determinant of ecosystem functioning. Numerous studies described positive effects
of diversity on the functioning of communities arising from complementary resource use and facilitation. However, high biodiversity may also increase competitive interactions, fostering antagonism and negatively affecting community performance. Using experimental bacterial communities we differentiated diversity effects based on genotypic richness and dissimilarity. We show that these diversity characteristics have opposite effects on ecosystem functioning. Genotypic dissimilarity governed complementary resource use, improving ecosystem functioning in complex resource environments. Contrastingly, genotypic richness drove allelopathic interactions, mostly reducing ecosystem functioning. The net biodiversity effect on community performance resulted from the interplay between the genetic structure of the community and resource complexity. These
results demonstrate that increasing richness, without concomitantly increasing dissimilarity, can decrease
ecosystem functioning in simple environments due to antagonistic interactions, an effect insufficiently
considered so far in mechanistic models of the biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationship.

Citations

63 citations in Web of Science®
63 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 18 May 2011
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
Uncontrolled Keywords:Antagonistic interactions, complementarity, dissimilarity, ecosystem functioning, functional diversity, species richness
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:18 May 2011 10:23
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 14:55
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:1461-023X
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01613.x

Download

[img]
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations