Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-49678
Fritz, J; Hummel, J; Kienzle, E; Wings, O; Streich, W J; Clauss, M (2011). Gizzard vs. teeth, it’s a tie: food-processing efficiency in herbivorous birds and mammals and implications for dinosaur feeding strategies. Paleobiology, 37(4):577-586.
|Published Version (English)|
PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher
|Accepted Version (English)|
Particle size reduction is a primary means of improving efficiency in herbivores. The mode of food particle size reduction is one of the main differences between herbivorous birds (gizzard) and mammals (teeth). For a quantitative comparison of the efficiency of food comminution, we investigated mean fecal particle sizes (MPS) in 14 herbivorous bird species and compared these with a data set of 111 non-ruminant herbivorous mammal species. In general MPS increased with body mass, but there was no significant difference between birds and mammals, suggesting a comparable efficiency of food processing by gizzards and chewing teeth. The results lead to the intriguing question of why gizzard systems have evolved comparatively rarely among amniote herbivores. Advantages linked to one of the two food comminution systems must, however, be sought in different effects other than size reduction itself. In paleoecological scenarios, the evolution of ‘‘dental batteries,’’ for example in ornithopod dinosaurs, should be considered an advantage compared to absence of mastication, but not compared to gizzard-based herbivory.
161 downloads since deposited on 19 Sep 2011
35 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Department of Small Animals|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||570 Life sciences; biology
|Deposited On:||19 Sep 2011 11:04|
|Last Modified:||30 Oct 2014 15:45|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page