UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Electronic prescribing increases uptake of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations in the hospital setting


Taegtmeyer, A B; Curkovic, I; Rufibach, K; Corti, N; Battegay, E; Kullak-Ublick, G A (2011). Electronic prescribing increases uptake of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations in the hospital setting. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 72(6):958-964.

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Electronic prescribing reduces drug prescription errors and therefore improves patient safety. • Whether electronic prescribing compared with prescribing on paper facilitates the implementation of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations in the care of patients hospitalized with medical problems is not known. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The use of electronic prescriptions when compared with handwritten prescriptions increased the uptake of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations for improving drug safety in hospitalized patients. AIMS To determine whether electronic prescribing facilitates the uptake of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations for improving drug safety in medical inpatients. METHODS Electronic case records and prescription charts (either electronic or paper) of 502 patients hospitalized on medical wards in a large Swiss teaching hospital between January 2009 and January 2010 were studied by four junior and four senior clinical pharmacologists. Drug-related problems were identified and interventions proposed. The implementation and time delays of these proposed interventions were compared between the patients for whom paper drug charts were used and the patients for whom electronic drug charts were used. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-eight drug-related problems in 109 hospital admissions were identified and 145 recommendations were made, of which 51% were implemented. Admissions with an electronic prescription chart (n= 90) were found to have 2.74 times higher odds for implementation of the change than those with a paper prescription chart (n= 53) (95% confidence interval 1.2, 6.3, P= 0.018, adjusted for any dependency introduced by patient, ward or clinical team; follow-up for two cases missing). The time delay between recommendations being made and their implementation (if any) was minimal (median 1 day) and did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Electronic prescribing in this hospital setting was associated with increased implementation of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations for improving drug safety when compared with handwritten prescribing on paper.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Electronic prescribing reduces drug prescription errors and therefore improves patient safety. • Whether electronic prescribing compared with prescribing on paper facilitates the implementation of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations in the care of patients hospitalized with medical problems is not known. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The use of electronic prescriptions when compared with handwritten prescriptions increased the uptake of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations for improving drug safety in hospitalized patients. AIMS To determine whether electronic prescribing facilitates the uptake of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations for improving drug safety in medical inpatients. METHODS Electronic case records and prescription charts (either electronic or paper) of 502 patients hospitalized on medical wards in a large Swiss teaching hospital between January 2009 and January 2010 were studied by four junior and four senior clinical pharmacologists. Drug-related problems were identified and interventions proposed. The implementation and time delays of these proposed interventions were compared between the patients for whom paper drug charts were used and the patients for whom electronic drug charts were used. RESULTS One hundred and fifty-eight drug-related problems in 109 hospital admissions were identified and 145 recommendations were made, of which 51% were implemented. Admissions with an electronic prescription chart (n= 90) were found to have 2.74 times higher odds for implementation of the change than those with a paper prescription chart (n= 53) (95% confidence interval 1.2, 6.3, P= 0.018, adjusted for any dependency introduced by patient, ward or clinical team; follow-up for two cases missing). The time delay between recommendations being made and their implementation (if any) was minimal (median 1 day) and did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Electronic prescribing in this hospital setting was associated with increased implementation of clinical pharmacologists' recommendations for improving drug safety when compared with handwritten prescribing on paper.

Citations

7 citations in Web of Science®
8 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 17 Nov 2011
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic and Policlinic for Internal Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:17 Nov 2011 14:30
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 15:06
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0306-5251
Publisher DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04032.x
PubMed ID:21627677
Permanent URL: http://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-51050

Download

[img]
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 690kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations