Elicitation methods in decision making under risk allow a researcher to infer thensubjective utilities of outcomes as well as the subjective weights of probabilities from observed preferences of an individual. An optimally efficient elicitation method is proposed, which takes into account the inevitable distortion of preferences by random errors and minimizesnthe effect of such errors on the inferred utility and probability weighting functions. Under mildnassumptions, the optimally efficient method for eliciting utilities (weights) of many outcomes (probabilities) is the following three-stage procedure. First, a probability is elicited whose subjective weight is one half. Second, an individual's utility function is elicited through the midpoint chaining certainty equivalent method employing the probability elicited at the first stagenas an input. Finally, an individual's probability weighting function is elicited through the probability equivalent method.

Blavatskyy, Pavlo R (2004). *Efficient elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions.* Working paper series / Institute for Empirical Research in Economics No. 211, University of Zurich.

## Abstract

Elicitation methods in decision making under risk allow a researcher to infer thensubjective utilities of outcomes as well as the subjective weights of probabilities from observed preferences of an individual. An optimally efficient elicitation method is proposed, which takes into account the inevitable distortion of preferences by random errors and minimizesnthe effect of such errors on the inferred utility and probability weighting functions. Under mildnassumptions, the optimally efficient method for eliciting utilities (weights) of many outcomes (probabilities) is the following three-stage procedure. First, a probability is elicited whose subjective weight is one half. Second, an individual's utility function is elicited through the midpoint chaining certainty equivalent method employing the probability elicited at the first stagenas an input. Finally, an individual's probability weighting function is elicited through the probability equivalent method.

## Downloads

## Additional indexing

Item Type: | Working Paper |
---|---|

Communities & Collections: | 03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Economics
Working Paper Series > Institute for Empirical Research in Economics (former) |

Dewey Decimal Classification: | 330 Economics |

Language: | English |

Date: | October 2004 |

Deposited On: | 29 Nov 2011 22:32 |

Last Modified: | 05 Apr 2016 15:10 |

Series Name: | Working paper series / Institute for Empirical Research in Economics |

ISSN: | 1424-0459 |

Official URL: | http://www.econ.uzh.ch/wp.html |

## Download

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.

You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.