UZH-Logo

Comparison of point-of-care testing (POCT): i-STAT(®) international normalized ratio (INR) vs reference laboratory INR in pediatric patients undergoing major surgery


Spielmann, N; Mauch, J Y; Madjdpour, C; Schmugge, M; Albisetti, M; Weiss, M; Haas, T (2011). Comparison of point-of-care testing (POCT): i-STAT(®) international normalized ratio (INR) vs reference laboratory INR in pediatric patients undergoing major surgery. Paediatric Anaesthesia, 21(10):1041-1045.

Abstract

Background:  The aim of the study was to compare international normalized ratio (INR) results obtained by point-of-care testing (i-STAT® device) with the reference laboratory INR in children undergoing major surgery with expected significant blood loss.

Methods:  Pediatric patients undergoing craniofacial, spine, hip, or cancer surgery were included. Blood samples for coagulation testing were tested at several intraoperative time points and generally withdrawn from the arterial catheter, if accessible. A volume of 1.4 ml citrated blood was used for the reference laboratory INR test, and 0.1 ml of blood was taken for the whole blood INR test using the i-STAT® device. Blood samples for both tests were withdrawn at the same time and immediately analyzed with both devices.

Results:  A total of 169 paired blood samples were taken intraoperatively from 44 pediatric patients [IQR 0.9–10.7 years (median 3.3)]. Reference laboratory INR ranged from 0.96 to 3.43 (mean 1.40; sd 0.32) and INR of i-STAT® from 0.95 to 2.29 (mean 1.26; sd 0.22). The correlation coefficient was 0.83 (P < 0.001), and the bias values were 0.12 and 0.55 at the medical decision level of ≤2.0 and >2.0, respectively.

Conclusions:  In the perioperative setting, point-of-care INR testing in children using the i-STAT® device is a reliable and easy-to-handle method for INR values ≤2.0, while INR values >2.0 might be underestimated.

Background:  The aim of the study was to compare international normalized ratio (INR) results obtained by point-of-care testing (i-STAT® device) with the reference laboratory INR in children undergoing major surgery with expected significant blood loss.

Methods:  Pediatric patients undergoing craniofacial, spine, hip, or cancer surgery were included. Blood samples for coagulation testing were tested at several intraoperative time points and generally withdrawn from the arterial catheter, if accessible. A volume of 1.4 ml citrated blood was used for the reference laboratory INR test, and 0.1 ml of blood was taken for the whole blood INR test using the i-STAT® device. Blood samples for both tests were withdrawn at the same time and immediately analyzed with both devices.

Results:  A total of 169 paired blood samples were taken intraoperatively from 44 pediatric patients [IQR 0.9–10.7 years (median 3.3)]. Reference laboratory INR ranged from 0.96 to 3.43 (mean 1.40; sd 0.32) and INR of i-STAT® from 0.95 to 2.29 (mean 1.26; sd 0.22). The correlation coefficient was 0.83 (P < 0.001), and the bias values were 0.12 and 0.55 at the medical decision level of ≤2.0 and >2.0, respectively.

Conclusions:  In the perioperative setting, point-of-care INR testing in children using the i-STAT® device is a reliable and easy-to-handle method for INR values ≤2.0, while INR values >2.0 might be underestimated.

Citations

4 citations in Web of Science®
4 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Medical Clinic
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Anesthesiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:20 Dec 2011 09:52
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 15:13
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:1155-5645
Publisher DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03600.x
PubMed ID:21545369

Download

Full text not available from this repository.View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations