UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

NAMA crediting: how to assess offsets from and additionality of policy-based mitigation actions in developing countries


Okubo, Y; Hayashi, D; Michaelowa, A (2011). NAMA crediting: how to assess offsets from and additionality of policy-based mitigation actions in developing countries. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 1(1):37-46.

Abstract

Climate policies in developing countries - called nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs) in negotiation jargon - are likely to generate greenhouse gas emissions credits after 2013. To guarantee credibility of the international climate policy regime, robust measurement, reporting and verification procedures are required. Compared to concrete emission reduction projects, assessment of the additionality of NAMAs is difficult. As only a subset of policy options leads to directly quantifiable emission reductions, the challenge is to define procedures that are conservative and still provide incentives to embark on policies with long-term and indirect effects. This requires a combination of an approach using default parameters and monitoring of key factors. Experience from methodologies used under the Clean Development Mechanism should be taken into account. Analysis of a renewable energy feed-in tariff in Korea and a nationwide demand-side management programme in Thailand shows that for the former, additionality and emission impacts of policies can be assessed, but require centralized, transparent data collection systems, an effective sector organization. The latter is probably not suitable for NAMA crediting under a stringent approach. To provide incentives for a greater number of developing countries, more standardized approaches would be required to allow covering policies that are more difficult to quantify.

Climate policies in developing countries - called nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs) in negotiation jargon - are likely to generate greenhouse gas emissions credits after 2013. To guarantee credibility of the international climate policy regime, robust measurement, reporting and verification procedures are required. Compared to concrete emission reduction projects, assessment of the additionality of NAMAs is difficult. As only a subset of policy options leads to directly quantifiable emission reductions, the challenge is to define procedures that are conservative and still provide incentives to embark on policies with long-term and indirect effects. This requires a combination of an approach using default parameters and monitoring of key factors. Experience from methodologies used under the Clean Development Mechanism should be taken into account. Analysis of a renewable energy feed-in tariff in Korea and a nationwide demand-side management programme in Thailand shows that for the former, additionality and emission impacts of policies can be assessed, but require centralized, transparent data collection systems, an effective sector organization. The latter is probably not suitable for NAMA crediting under a stringent approach. To provide incentives for a greater number of developing countries, more standardized approaches would be required to allow covering policies that are more difficult to quantify.

Altmetrics

Downloads

146 downloads since deposited on 05 Jan 2012
13 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Uncontrolled Keywords:additionality, baseline, carbon finance, climate policy, developing countries, mitigation, MRV, NAMA
Language:English
Date:1 February 2011
Deposited On:05 Jan 2012 09:51
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 15:14
Publisher:Earthscan
ISSN:2043-0779
Additional Information:This is an electronic version of an article published in Okubo, Y; Hayashi, D; Michaelowa, A (2011). NAMA crediting: how to assess offsets from and additionality of policy-based mitigation actions in developing countries. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management, 1(1):37-46. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management is available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3763/ghgmm.2010.0002
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.3763/ghgmm.2010.0002
Permanent URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-52842

Download

[img]
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 409kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations