Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-53776

Isbister, J P; Shander, A; Spahn, D R; Erhard, J; Farmer, S L; Hofmann, A (2011). Adverse blood transfusion outcomes: establishing causation. Transfusion Medicine Reviews, 25(2):89-101.

[img]Published Version
PDF - Registered users only
422kB

View at publisher

Abstract

The transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs) and other blood components is ingrained in modern medical practice. The rationale for administering transfusions is based on key assumptions that efficacy is established and risks are acceptable and minimized. Despite the cliché that, "the blood supply is safer than ever," data about risks and lack of efficacy of RBC transfusions in several clinical settings have steadily accumulated. Frequentist statisticians and clinicians demand evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs); however, causation for the recognized serious hazards of allogeneic transfusion has never been established in this manner. On the other hand, the preponderance of evidence implicating RBC transfusions in adverse clinical outcomes related to immunomodulation and the storage lesion comes from observational studies, and a broad and critical analysis to evaluate causation is overdue. It is suggested in several circumstances that this cannot wait for the design, execution, and conduct of rigorous RCTs. We begin by examining the nature and definition of causation with relevant examples from transfusion medicine. Deductive deterministic methods may be applied to most of the well-accepted and understood serious hazards of transfusion, with modified Koch's postulates being fulfilled in most circumstances. On the other hand, when several possible interacting risk factors exist and RBC transfusions are associated with adverse clinical outcomes, establishing causation requires inferential probabilistic methodology. In the latter circumstances, the case for RBC transfusions being causal for adverse clinical outcomes can be strengthened by applying modified Bradford Hill criteria to the plethora of existing observational studies. This being the case, a greater precautionary approach to RBC transfusion is necessary and equipoise that justifying RCTs may become problematic.

Citations

38 citations in Web of Science®
52 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

2 downloads since deposited on 13 Jan 2012
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Anesthesiology
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Uncontrolled Keywords:review
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:13 Jan 2012 13:04
Last Modified:29 Nov 2013 11:14
Publisher:W.B. Saunders
ISSN:0887-7963
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.tmrv.2010.11.001
PubMed ID:21345639

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page