Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, 5.7.2016, 07:00-08:00

Maintenance work on ZORA and JDB on Tuesday, 5th July, 07h00-08h00. During this time there will be a brief unavailability for about 1 hour. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-53804

Ludwig, A A; Baulig, W; Biro, P (2011). A simulated severe difficult airway does not alter the intubation performance with the SensaScope: a prospective randomised manikin study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 28(6):449-453.

[img]Published Version (English)
PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher



Prospective randomised controlled study.

Operation unit in a tertiary academic university hospital in a central European city. Period of the study was springtime and summer 2010.

Twenty-four anaesthesiologists with various levels of professional experience were allocated to intubate an airway manikin either with the SensaScope (group S) or with the conventional Macintosh 3 laryngoscope (group L).

Each participant performed three consecutive intubations with normal anatomy followed by three intubations with difficult anatomy. The airway difficulty was simulated by inflation of the manikin's tongue base with 40 ml of air. The times taken to view the larynx and to insert the tracheal tube were noted. The resulting tube position and the occurrence of dental damage were recorded.

Those planned in the protocol.

In normal anatomy, the laryngeal view (group L 5.9 ± 4.2 s vs. group S 9.2 ± 3.5 s) and intubation (group L 13.4 ± 7.6 s vs. group S 23.3 ± 8.6 s) was more rapidly obtained with conventional laryngoscopy (values presented as mean ± SD). In difficult anatomy, only the SensaScope permitted successful laryngeal view (group L impossible vs. group S 9.9 ± 4.8 s) and tracheal intubation (group L impossible vs. group S 23.4 ± 8.8 s). The latter always enabled correct tracheal tube position, whereas with laryngoscopy alone either oesophageal intubation or aborted attempts resulted. In the difficult airway setting, the frequency of simulated tooth damage was also significantly higher with conventional laryngoscopy (group L 26 of 36 vs. group S 6 of 36).

The SensaScope performed fairly well in normal intubation anatomy, although its use was more complex than with conventional laryngoscopy and it required a slightly longer time. In the difficult airway setting, the SensaScope performed as well as in normal anatomy, whereas intubation by direct laryngoscopy proved to be impossible. The SensaScope enables the user to overcome severe airway difficulties caused by large tissue masses at the level of the tongue base or mouth floor.


3 citations in Web of Science®
3 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



1 download since deposited on 11 Jan 2012
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Anesthesiology
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Deposited On:11 Jan 2012 20:23
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 15:18
Publisher:Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins
Additional Information:Comment in: Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012 Jan;29(1):55-6; author reply 56-57.
Publisher DOI:10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283460fc9
PubMed ID:21544022

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page