Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-54005

Gerber, C; Snedeker, J G; Krause, A S; Appenzeller, A; Farshad, M (2011). Osteochondral glenoid allograft for biologic resurfacing of the glenoid: biomechanical comparison of novel design concepts. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 20(6):909-916.

[img]Published Version
PDF - Registered users only
1037Kb

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Biologic resurfacing of the glenoid has hitherto failed to adequately restore the geometry and biology of the glenoid. We hypothesised that a new concept for a press-fit osteochondral allograft glenoid replacement would restore the anatomic geometry of the glenoid, with primary stability guaranteed by the construct through press-fit fixation alone.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Five sawbone models of human scapulae and 5 models using sheep scapulae were prepared for testing of 3 different interface designs (cross, rectangle, and dovetail). Micromotion at the graft interface was assessed in response to 1000 cycles of 30 N shear and 100 N compressive load, and maximal craniocaudal force was determined under 500 N compressive load.
RESULTS:

In sawbones, mean (range) micromotion ranged from 38 (13-88) μm for cross to 208 (89-335) μm for rectangle, and decreased to 29 (21-57) μm for cross to 104 (34-127) μm for rectangle after 1000 cycles of applied shear force. In sheep bone, the mean (range) of micromotion was 15 (9-22) μm for dovetail to 51 (10-503) μm for cross and decreased to 15 (10-20) μm for dovetail to 44 (24-199) μm for cross; after 1000 cycles with the rectangle design, it decreased from 32 (25-217) μm to 16 (9-143) μm.
DISCUSSION:

Despite biomechanical differences, in vitro allograft stability was generally adequate for all tested designs, particularly after the graft was allowed to "seat" by repetitive loading. While various geometries are potentially candidates for press-fitting a glenoid allograft to a host scapula, a rectangular interface between graft and host provided a favorable combination of both technical feasibility and biomechanical reliability.
CONCLUSION:

The concept of an osteochondral glenoid allograft for glenoid reconstruction is technically feasible and demonstrates adequate primary stability in vitro.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:17 Jan 2012 14:26
Last Modified:06 Dec 2013 13:18
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1058-2746
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.020
PubMed ID:21444216
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 3
Google Scholar™

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page