Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-54827
Bühlmann, Marc; Germann, Micha; Vatter, Adrian (2011). The multidimensionality of democracy: Institutional patterns and democratic quality: Lijphart's democratic quality thesis revisited. In: 1st Annual Conference of the European Political Science Association (EPSA) , Dublin, 16 June 2011 - 18 June 2011.
In his seminal work Patterns of Democracy, Arend Lijphart shows that, among other factors, power sharing enhances the quality of democracy. Lijphart’s analysis, however, suffers from a rather unsystematic and arbitrary choice of measures of democratic quality and from an implicit treatment of consensus democracy as a onedimensional concept. Our reanalysis aims at correcting for both. We make use of two new and unique datasets, the Democracy Barometer (DB) and the Consensus Democracy Indicators. Our results suggest that Lijphart is right, yet only in principle. Indeed, overall democratic quality seems to profit from power sharing. However, our findings lead to two important refinements of Lijphart’s democratic quality thesis. First, power sharing does not foster every aspect of the quality of democracy and, even worse, brings about low transparency. Second, the combination of consensus and majoritarian traits appears to matter. In particular, consensus-unitary democracies fare best – particularly if accompanied by consensual traits on the third consensus dimension that was not originally contemplated by Lijphart – and notably better than pure consensus democracies.
|Item Type:||Conference or Workshop Item (Paper), not refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
02 Faculty of Law > Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (C2D)
|DDC:||320 Political science
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||consensus democracy, majoritarian democracy, quality of democracy, consociational democracy|
|Event End Date:||18 June 2011|
|Deposited On:||01 Feb 2012 10:07|
|Last Modified:||26 Aug 2014 08:03|
|Additional Information:||Kinder and Gentler Indeed? The Lijphart Thesis Revisited|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page