Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-55468

Fehr, J; Glass, T R; Louvel, S; Hamy, F; Hirsch, H H; von Wyl, V; Böni, J; Yerly, S; Bürgisser, P; Cavassini, M; Fux, C A; Hirschel, B; Vernazza, P; Martinetti, G; Bernasconi, E; Günthard, H F; Battegay, M; Bucher, H C; Klimkait, T (2011). Replicative phenotyping adds value to genotypic resistance testing in heavily pre-treated HIV-infected individuals--the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Journal of Translational Medicine, 9:14.

[img]
Preview
Published Version
PDF
260kB

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Replicative phenotypic HIV resistance testing (rPRT) uses recombinant infectious virus to measure viral replication in the presence of antiretroviral drugs. Due to its high sensitivity of detection of viral minorities and its dissecting power for complex viral resistance patterns and mixed virus populations rPRT might help to improve HIV resistance diagnostics, particularly for patients with multiple drug failures. The aim was to investigate whether the addition of rPRT to genotypic resistance testing (GRT) compared to GRT alone is beneficial for obtaining a virological response in heavily pre-treated HIV-infected patients.
METHODS:

Patients with resistance tests between 2002 and 2006 were followed within the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS). We assessed patients' virological success after their antiretroviral therapy was switched following resistance testing. Multilevel logistic regression models with SHCS centre as a random effect were used to investigate the association between the type of resistance test and virological response (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL or ≥1.5 log reduction).
RESULTS:

Of 1158 individuals with resistance tests 221 with GRT+rPRT and 937 with GRT were eligible for analysis. Overall virological response rates were 85.1% for GRT+rPRT and 81.4% for GRT. In the subgroup of patients with >2 previous failures, the odds ratio (OR) for virological response of GRT+rPRT compared to GRT was 1.45 (95% CI 1.00-2.09). Multivariate analyses indicate a significant improvement with GRT+rPRT compared to GRT alone (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.31-2.15).
CONCLUSIONS:

In heavily pre-treated patients rPRT-based resistance information adds benefit, contributing to a higher rate of treatment success.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Medical Virology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Infectious Diseases
DDC:570 Life sciences; biology
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2011
Deposited On:22 Jan 2012 14:33
Last Modified:21 Dec 2013 04:11
Publisher:BioMed Central
ISSN:1479-5876
Publisher DOI:10.1186/1479-5876-9-14
Official URL:http://www.translational-medicine.com/content/9/1/14
PubMed ID:21255386
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 5
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 5

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page