UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Can we use the CO2 concentrations determined by continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry from small samples for the Keeling plot approach?


Joos, O; Saurer, M; Heim, A; Hagedorn, F; Schmidt, M W I; Siegwolf, R T W (2008). Can we use the CO2 concentrations determined by continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry from small samples for the Keeling plot approach? Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 22(24):4029-4034.

Abstract

A common method to estimate the carbon isotopic composition of soil-respired air is to use Keeling plots (d13C versus 1/CO2 concentration). This approach requires the precise determination of both CO2 concentration ([CO2]), usually measured with an infrared gas analyser (IRGA) in the
field, and the analysis of d13C by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) in the laboratory. We measured [CO2] with an IRGA in the field (n 637) and simultaneously collected air samples in 12 mL vials for analysis of the 13C values and the [CO2] using a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer. In this study we tested if measurements by the IRGA and IRMS yielded the same results for [CO2], and also investigated the effects of different sample vial preparation methods on the [CO2] measurement and the thereby obtained Keeling plot results. Our results show that IRMS
measurements of the [CO2] (during the isotope analysis) were lower than when the [CO2] was measured in the field with the IRGA. This is especially evident when the sample vials were not treated in the same way as the standard vials. From the three different vial preparation methods, the one using N2-filled and overpressurised vials resulted in the best agreement between the IRGA and IRMS [CO2] values. There was no effect on the 13C-values from the different methods. The Keeling plot results confirmed that the overpressurised vials performed best. We conclude that in the cases where the ranges of [CO2] are large (>300 ppm; in our case it ranged between 70 and 1500 ppm) reliable estimation of the [CO2] with small samples using IRMS is possible for Keeling plot application. We also suggest some guidelines for sample handling in order to achieve proper results.

A common method to estimate the carbon isotopic composition of soil-respired air is to use Keeling plots (d13C versus 1/CO2 concentration). This approach requires the precise determination of both CO2 concentration ([CO2]), usually measured with an infrared gas analyser (IRGA) in the
field, and the analysis of d13C by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) in the laboratory. We measured [CO2] with an IRGA in the field (n 637) and simultaneously collected air samples in 12 mL vials for analysis of the 13C values and the [CO2] using a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer. In this study we tested if measurements by the IRGA and IRMS yielded the same results for [CO2], and also investigated the effects of different sample vial preparation methods on the [CO2] measurement and the thereby obtained Keeling plot results. Our results show that IRMS
measurements of the [CO2] (during the isotope analysis) were lower than when the [CO2] was measured in the field with the IRGA. This is especially evident when the sample vials were not treated in the same way as the standard vials. From the three different vial preparation methods, the one using N2-filled and overpressurised vials resulted in the best agreement between the IRGA and IRMS [CO2] values. There was no effect on the 13C-values from the different methods. The Keeling plot results confirmed that the overpressurised vials performed best. We conclude that in the cases where the ranges of [CO2] are large (>300 ppm; in our case it ranged between 70 and 1500 ppm) reliable estimation of the [CO2] with small samples using IRMS is possible for Keeling plot application. We also suggest some guidelines for sample handling in order to achieve proper results.

Citations

15 citations in Web of Science®
14 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

116 downloads since deposited on 19 Jan 2009
15 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
Dewey Decimal Classification:910 Geography & travel
Language:English
Date:13 November 2008
Deposited On:19 Jan 2009 11:37
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:34
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0951-4198
Funders:Swiss National Foundation (SNF), Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research, NCCR Climate project WP 3.1 PLANT/SOIL
Publisher DOI:10.1002/rcm.3827
Permanent URL: http://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-5618

Download

[img]
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 1MB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations