Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, 5.7.2016, 07:00-08:00

Maintenance work on ZORA and JDB on Tuesday, 5th July, 07h00-08h00. During this time there will be a brief unavailability for about 1 hour. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-57953

Mueller, D M; Rentsch, K M (2012). Online extraction toxicological MS(n) screening system for serum and heparinized plasma and comparison of screening results between plasma and urine in the context of clinical data. Journal of Chromatography B, 883-884:189-197.

[img]Published Version
PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher



The two main matrices for screening are urine or serum and heparinized plasma. Whereas urine has the advantage of usually higher concentrations and longer detection windows, serum or heparinized plasma represent the current systemic drug exposure of a patient.

An online extraction LC-MS(n) method using a MS(2) and MS(3) spectral library for the identification of substances has been developed and validated to screen serum and heparinized plasma. Extraction was performed by online turbulent flow chromatography under alkaline conditions. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a phenyl/hexyl column with acidic eluents. For detection, a linear ion trap, equipped with an APCI interface, was used and the different compounds were identified using a MS(2) and MS(3) spectral library containing 453 compounds. From 47 patients, urine and heparinized plasma samples were analyzed and the results compared.

The validation of the method gave satisfactory results. Only 3% of the compounds showed a matrix effect>10% in serum. For all other substances and heparinized plasma, the quantitative matrix effect was <10%. 78% of the compounds where a therapeutic range was described in the literature had a limit of identification below the therapeutic range in heparinized plasma and 77% in serum, respectively. In urine and heparinized plasma samples, a total of 168 substances (identified as 86 different compounds) could be identified. In 20 out of 47 cases (43%), the results were identical. On a substance level, the agreement between urine and heparinized plasma was in average 71% with a range of 0-100%.

The presented method allows a fast identification of 453 substances in serum and heparinized plasma. If plasma or serum is used for toxicological screening, the current systemic exposure of a patient can be monitored.


20 citations in Web of Science®
17 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



0 downloads since deposited on 02 Apr 2012
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Clinical Chemistry
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
540 Chemistry
Deposited On:02 Apr 2012 08:43
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 15:32
Publisher DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.08.022
PubMed ID:21907644

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page