Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-59392
Ringer, S K; Portier, K; Fourel, I; Bettschart-Wolfensberger, R (2012). Development of a romifidine constant rate infusion with or without butorphanol for standing sedation of horses. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 39(1):12-20.
PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher
OBJECTIVE: To determine constant rate infusion (CRI) protocols for romifidine (R) and romifidine combined with butorphanol (RB) resulting in constant sedation and romifidine plasma concentrations. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded randomized crossover study. ANIMALS: Ten adult research horses. METHODS: Part I: After determining normal height of head above ground (HHAG = 100%), loading doses of romifidine (80 μg kg(-1)) with butorphanol (RB: 18 μg kg(-1)) or saline (R) were given intravenously (IV). Immediately afterwards, a butorphanol (RB: 25 μg kg(-1) hour(-1)) or saline (R) CRI was administered for 2 hours. The HHAG was used as marker of sedation depth. Sedation was maintained for 2 hours by additional romifidine (20 μg kg(-1) ) whenever HHAG > 50%. The dose rate of romifidine (μg kg(-1) hour(-1)) required to maintain sedation was calculated for both treatments. Part II: After loading doses, the romifidine CRIs derived from part I were administered in parallel to butorphanol (RB) or saline (R). Sedation and ataxia were evaluated periodically. Romifidine plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC-MS-MS at 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 105, and 120 minutes. Data were analyzed using paired t-test, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and two-way anova for repeated measures (p < 0.05). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in romifidine requirements (R: 30; RB: 29 μg kg(-1) hour(-1)). CRI protocols leading to constant sedation were developed. Time to first additional romifidine bolus was significantly longer in RB (mean ± SD, R: 38.5 ± 13.6; RB: 50.5 ± 11.7 minutes). Constant plasma concentrations of romifidine were achieved during the second hour of CRI. Ataxia was greater when butorphanol was added. CONCLUSION: Romifidine bolus, followed by CRI, provided constant sedation assessed by HHAG. Butorphanol was ineffective in reducing romifidine requirements in unstimulated horses, but prolonged the sedation caused by the initial romifidine bolus. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both protocols need to be tested under clinical conditions.
1 download since deposited on 01 Mar 2012
0 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Equine Department|
|Dewey Decimal Classification:||570 Life sciences; biology
|Deposited On:||01 Mar 2012 13:11|
|Last Modified:||28 Oct 2014 16:22|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page