Abbot, P; Abe, J; Alcock, J; Alizon, S; Alpedrinha, J A C; Andersson, M; Andre, J-B; van Baalen, M; Balloux, F; Balshine, S; Barton, N; Beukeboom, L W; Biernaskie, J M; Bilde, T; Borgia, G; Breed, M; Brown, S; Bshary, R; Buckling, A; Burley, N T; Burton-Chellew, M N; Cant, M A; Chapuisat, M; Charnov, E L; Clutton-Brock, T; Cockburn, A; Cole, B J; Colegrave, N; Cosmides, L; Couzin, I D; Coyne, J A; Creel, S; Crespi, B; Curry, R L; Dall, S R X; Day, T; Dickinson, J L; Dugatkin, L A; El Mouden, C; Emlen, S T; Evans, J; Ferriere, R; Field, J; Foitzik, S; Foster, K; Foster, W A; Fox, C W; Gadau, J; Gandon, S; Gardner, A; Gardner, M G; Getty, T; Goodisman, M A D; Grafen, A; Grosberg, R; Grozinger, C M; Gouyon, P-H; Gwynne, D; Harvey, P H; Hatchwell, B J; Heinze, J; Helantera, H; Helms, K R; Hill, K; Jiricny, N; Johnstone, R; Kacelnik, A; Kiers, E T; Kokko, H; Komdeur, J; Korb, J; Kronauer, D; Kümmerli, R; Lehmann, L; Linksvayer, T A; Lion, S; Lyon, B; Marshall, J A R; McElreath, R; Michalakis, Y; Michod, R E; Mock, D; Monnin, T; Montgomerie, R; Moore, A J; Mueller, U G; Noë, R; Okasha, S; Pamilo, P; Parker, G A; Pedersen, J S; Pen, I; Pfennig, D; Queller, D C; Rankin, D J; Reece, S E; Reeve, H K; Reuter, M; Roberts, G; Robson, S K A; Roze, D; Rousset, F; Rueppell, O; Sachs, J L; Santorelli, L; Schmid-Hempel, P; Schwarz, M P; Scott-Phillips, T; Shellmann-Sherman, J; Sherman, P W; Shuker, D M; Smith, J; Spagna, J C; Strassmann, B; Suarez, A V; Sundström, L; Taborsky, M; Taylor, P; Thompson, G; Tooby, J; Tsutsui, N D; Tsuji, K; Turillazzi, S; Ubeda, F; Vargo, E L; Voelkl, B; Wenseleers, T; West, S A; West-Eberhard, M J; Westneat, D F; Wiernasz, D C; Wild, G; Wrangham, R; Young, A J; Zeh, D W; Zeh, J A; Zink, A (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471(7339):E1-4; author reply E9.
Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher
Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson 466, 1057-1062 (2010); Nowak et al. reply. Nowak et al. argue that inclusive fitness theory has been of little value in explaining the natural world, and that it has led to negligible progress in explaining the evolution of eusociality. However, we believe that their arguments are based upon a misunderstanding of evolutionary theory and a misrepresentation of the empirical literature. We will focus our comments on three general issues.
1 download since deposited on 09 Mar 2012
0 downloads since 12 months
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, further contribution|
|Communities & Collections:||07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies|
|DDC:||570 Life sciences; biology
590 Animals (Zoology)
|Date:||20 March 2011|
|Deposited On:||09 Mar 2012 15:39|
|Last Modified:||27 Nov 2013 19:34|
|Publisher:||Nature Publishing Group|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page