Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-6229
Zuber, M; Cuculi, F; Oechslin, E; Erne, P; Jenni, R (2008). Is transesophageal echocardiography still necessary to exclude patent foramen ovale? Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal : SCJ, 42(3):222-225.
- Registered users only
OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines still recommend transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as reference method to diagnose interatrial shunts. The aim was to test the accuracy of high-end transthoracal echocardiography (TTE) to exclude inter-atrial shunts. METHODS: Prospective TTE and TEE study with second harmonic imaging to determine left-to-right shunt (L/R) by both colour Doppler or R/L by contrast echocardiography in patients with unexplained cerebrovascular incidents or newly detected valvular or myocardial disease. RESULTS: An inter-atrial shunt was diagnosed in 200 of 438 analyzed patients (117 males). Colour Doppler echocardiography visualized a shunt in 67 patients (34%) on TTE vs. 84 (42%) patients on TEE (p <0.0001). However injection of agitated blood with a valsalva maneuver detected 190 (95%) interatrial shunts by both TTE and TEE, but 10 shunts (5%) only by TTE. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that patent foramen ovale can safely be demonstrated with high-end transthoracic contrast- echocardiography. If additional studies confirm our results, TTE has the potential to become the method of choice in the diagnosis of PFO.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiology|
|DDC:||610 Medicine & health|
|Deposited On:||01 Dec 2008 14:26|
|Last Modified:||07 Jan 2014 04:21|
|Publisher:||Taylor & Francis|
|Additional Information:||This is an electronic version of an article published in Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, Volume 42, Issue 3 2008 , pages 222 - 225. Is transesophageal echocardiography still necessary to exclude patent foramen ovale? is available online at DOI: 10.1080/14017430801932832|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times Cited: 9|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 11
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page