Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-63563
Mortezavi, Ashkan; Hermanns, Thomas; Seifert, Hans-Helge; Wild, Peter J; Schmid, Daniel M; Sulser, Tullio; Eberli, Daniel (2012). Intrafascial dissection significantly increases positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urologia Internationalis, 89:17-24.
Introduction: Improved visualization and magnification in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) has tempted many urologists to dissect the neurovascular bundle closer to the prostate following the layers of the pseudo-capsule of the prostate. This might bear a higher risk of decreased tumor control. Materials and Methods: An analysis of a consecutive series of 186 patients who underwent RALRP at our institution was performed. The outcome of patients with intrafascial nerve-sparing (INS) was compared with the outcome of patients who underwent interfascial, extrafascial or no nerve-sparing (non-INS). Results: A total of 80 patients (43.0%) received INS. The overall R1 rate was 27.9%. For pT2 tumors the rate of R1 was 33.8% in INS versus 14.8% in non-INS (odds ratio 2.936, 95% confidence interval 1.338-6.443, p = 0.007). Recurrence-free survival was significantly shorter in INS (p = 0.05; hazard ratio 3.791). Conclusion: The intrafascial dissection technique for RALRP bears a high risk of incomplete resection in localized prostate cancer resulting in unfavorable outcome.
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Surgical Pathology|
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Urological Clinic
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Division of Surgical Research
|DDC:||610 Medicine & health|
|Deposited On:||26 Jul 2012 09:00|
|Last Modified:||08 Dec 2013 02:12|
|Additional Information:||© 2012 S. Karger AG|
|Citations:||Web of Science®|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 1
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page