UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Liver Fat Quantification by Dual-echo MR Imaging Outperforms Traditional Histopathological Analysis


Fischer, Michael A; Raptis, Dimitri A; Montani, Matteo; Graf, Rolf; Clavien, Pierre-Alain; Nanz, Daniel; Alkadhi, Hatem; Scheffel, Hans (2012). Liver Fat Quantification by Dual-echo MR Imaging Outperforms Traditional Histopathological Analysis. Academic Radiology, 19(10):1208-1214.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dual-echo (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without fat and water separation for the quantification of liver fat content (LFC) in vitro and in patients undergoing liver surgery, with comparison to histopathologic analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on a 1.5-T scanner using a three-dimensional DE MRI sequence with automated reconstruction of in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) and fat-signal-only and water-signal-only images. LFC was estimated by fat fractions from IP and OP images (MRI(IP/OP)) and from Dixon-based fat-only and water-only images (MRI(DIxON)). Seven phantoms containing a titrated mixture of liver and fat from 0% to 50% were examined. Forty-three biopsies in 22 patients undergoing liver surgery were prospectively evaluated by a pathologist by traditional determination of the cell-count fraction and by a computer-based algorithm, the latter serving as the reference standard. RESULTS: In vitro, both MRI(IP/OP) and MRI(DIxON) were significantly correlated with titrated LFC (r = 0.993, P < .001), with a smaller measurement bias for MRI(IP/OP) (+2.6%) than for MRI(DIxON) (+4.5%). In vivo, both MRI(IP/OP) and MRI(DIxON) from DE MRI were correlated significantly better with computer-based histologic results (P < .001) and showed significantly smaller measurement bias (4.8% vs 21.1%) compared to histologic cell-count fraction (P < .001). Measurement bias was significantly smaller for MRI(IP/OP) than for MRI(DIxON) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: DE MRI allows the accurate quantification of LFC in a surgical population, outperforming traditional histopathologic analysis. DE MRI without fat and water separation shows the highest accuracy and smallest measurement bias for the quantification of LFC.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of dual-echo (DE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without fat and water separation for the quantification of liver fat content (LFC) in vitro and in patients undergoing liver surgery, with comparison to histopathologic analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI was performed on a 1.5-T scanner using a three-dimensional DE MRI sequence with automated reconstruction of in-phase (IP) and out-of-phase (OP) and fat-signal-only and water-signal-only images. LFC was estimated by fat fractions from IP and OP images (MRI(IP/OP)) and from Dixon-based fat-only and water-only images (MRI(DIxON)). Seven phantoms containing a titrated mixture of liver and fat from 0% to 50% were examined. Forty-three biopsies in 22 patients undergoing liver surgery were prospectively evaluated by a pathologist by traditional determination of the cell-count fraction and by a computer-based algorithm, the latter serving as the reference standard. RESULTS: In vitro, both MRI(IP/OP) and MRI(DIxON) were significantly correlated with titrated LFC (r = 0.993, P < .001), with a smaller measurement bias for MRI(IP/OP) (+2.6%) than for MRI(DIxON) (+4.5%). In vivo, both MRI(IP/OP) and MRI(DIxON) from DE MRI were correlated significantly better with computer-based histologic results (P < .001) and showed significantly smaller measurement bias (4.8% vs 21.1%) compared to histologic cell-count fraction (P < .001). Measurement bias was significantly smaller for MRI(IP/OP) than for MRI(DIxON) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: DE MRI allows the accurate quantification of LFC in a surgical population, outperforming traditional histopathologic analysis. DE MRI without fat and water separation shows the highest accuracy and smallest measurement bias for the quantification of LFC.

Citations

3 citations in Web of Science®
3 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:26 July 2012
Deposited On:07 Aug 2012 14:08
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 15:55
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1076-6332
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.05.009
PubMed ID:22841289

Download

Full text not available from this repository.View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations