Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Bleul, U; Bachofner, C; Stocker, H; Hässig, M; Braun, U (2005). Comparison of sodium bicarbonate and Carbicarb for the treatment of metabolic acidosis in newborn calves. Veterinary Record, 156(7):202-206.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Carbicarb (an equimolar mixture of sodium bicarbonate and sodium carbonate) was compared with sodium bicarbonate alone for the treatment of acidosis in newborn calves: 25 of 49 calves with a blood pH at birth of less than 7-2 and a base deficit of less than -3 mmol/litre were treated intravenously with sodium bicarbonate and 24 were treated with carbicarb. The doses were calculated on the basis of the base deficit in a blood sample taken 10 minutes after birth, and further blood samples were taken immediately after the treatment and 30 and 60 minutes after the treatment for the determination of acid-base status, blood gases and haematological and biochemical variables. Both treatments resulted in a significant increase in blood pH, but there was no difference between them. The mean (sd) blood pH before treatment was 7.09 (0.02) and after treatment it was 7.28 (0.01). There was no increase in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide after treatment with either sodium bicarbonate or carbicarb. Both treatments were associated with an increase in sodium concentration and decreases in the total erythrocyte count, haematocrit and haemoglobin concentration.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:05 Vetsuisse Faculty > Veterinary Clinic > Department of Farm Animals > Clinic for Reproductive Medicine
DDC:570 Life sciences; biology
630 Agriculture
Language:English
Date:2005
Deposited On:09 Aug 2012 12:29
Last Modified:16 May 2013 10:24
Publisher:British Veterinary Association
ISSN:0042-4900
Publisher DOI:10.1036/vr.156.7.202
Official URL:http://veterinaryrecord.bmj.com/content/156/7/202.abstract
PubMed ID:15747656
Citations:Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 19

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page