Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-64805

Schofield, Thomas M; Penny, Will D; Stephan, Klaas E; Crinion, Jennifer T; Thompson, Alan J; Price, Cathy J; Leff, A P (2012). Changes in auditory feedback connections determine the severity of speech processing deficits after stroke. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(12):4260-4270.

[img]
Preview
Published Version
PDF
1MB

Abstract

We compared brain structure and function in two subgroups of 21 stroke patients with either moderate or severe chronic speech comprehension impairment. Both groups had damage to the supratemporal plane; however, the severe group suffered greater damage to two unimodal auditory areas: primary auditory cortex and the planum temporale. The effects of this damage were investigated using fMRI while patients listened to speech and speech-like sounds. Pronounced changes in connectivity were found in both groups in undamaged parts of the auditory hierarchy. Compared to controls, moderate patients had significantly stronger feedback connections from planum temporale to primary auditory cortex bilaterally, while in severe patients this connection was significantly weaker in the undamaged right hemisphere. This suggests that predictive feedback mechanisms compensate in moderately affected patients but not in severely affected patients. The key pathomechanism in humans with persistent speech comprehension impairments may be impaired feedback connectivity to unimodal auditory areas.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Institute of Biomedical Engineering
DDC:170 Ethics
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:March 2012
Deposited On:24 Sep 2012 14:47
Last Modified:17 Dec 2013 02:39
Publisher:Society for Neuroscience
ISSN:0270-6474
Free access at:PubMed ID. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4670-11.2012
PubMed ID:22442088
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 10
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 10

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page