Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-8143
Mugavero, M J; May, M; Harris, R; Saag, M S; Costagliola, D; Egger, M; Phillips, A; Günthard, H F; Dabis, F; Hogg, R; de Wolf, F; Fatkenheuer, G; Gill, M J; Justice, A; D'Arminio Monforte, A; Lampe, F; Miró, J M; Staszewski, S; Sterne, J A C (2008). Does short-term virologic failure translate to clinical events in antiretroviral-naïve patients initiating antiretroviral therapy in clinical practice? AIDS, 22(18):2481-2492.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether differences in short-term virologic failure among commonly used antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens translate to differences in clinical events in antiretroviral-naïve patients initiating ART. DESIGN: Observational cohort study of patients initiating ART between January 2000 and December 2005. SETTING: The Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC) is a collaboration of 15 HIV cohort studies from Canada, Europe, and the United States. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13 546 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-positive patients initiating ART with efavirenz, nevirapine, lopinavir/ritonavir, nelfinavir, or abacavir as third drugs in combination with a zidovudine and lamivudine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term (24-week) virologic failure (>500 copies/ml) and clinical events within 2 years of ART initiation (incident AIDS-defining event, death, and a composite measure of these two outcomes). RESULTS: Compared with efavirenz as initial third drug, short-term virologic failure was more common with all other third drugs evaluated; nevirapine (adjusted odds ratio = 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.58-2.22), lopinavir/ritonavir (1.32, 95% CI = 1.12-1.57), nelfinavir (3.20, 95% CI = 2.74-3.74), and abacavir (2.13, 95% CI = 1.82-2.50). However, the rate of clinical events within 2 years of ART initiation appeared higher only with nevirapine (adjusted hazard ratio for composite outcome measure 1.27, 95% CI = 1.04-1.56) and abacavir (1.22, 95% CI = 1.00-1.48). CONCLUSION: Among antiretroviral-naïve patients initiating therapy, between-ART regimen, differences in short-term virologic failure do not necessarily translate to differences in clinical outcomes. Our results should be interpreted with caution because of the possibility of residual confounding by indication.
|Contributors:||Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC)|
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Infectious Diseases|
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Medical Clinic
|DDC:||610 Medicine & health|
|Deposited On:||22 Dec 2008 14:06|
|Last Modified:||27 Nov 2013 22:37|
|Publisher:||Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins|
|Citations:||Web of Science®. Times cited: 8|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page