Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

Zurich Open Repository and Archive 

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-8310

Müller, M K; Räder, S; Wildi, S; Hauser, R; Clavien, P A; Weber, M (2008). Long-term follow-up of proximal versus distal laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. British Journal of Surgery, 95(11):1375-1379.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
1MB

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastric bypass is the 'gold standard' for treatment of morbidly obese patients in many centres. There is debate regarding the optimal length for small bowel limbs. This study aimed to determine whether the proximal or distal approach is better. METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing primary distal gastric bypass in 2000-2002 were randomly matched for age, sex and preoperative body mass index (BMI) with 25 patients having a primary proximal bypass. All distal operations were performed laparoscopically; one proximal procedure was converted to open surgery. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 170 min for proximal and 242 min for distal bypasses (P = 0.004); median hospital stay was similar in the two groups. There were no deaths and the overall complication rate was similar, as was weight loss at 4 years: BMI decreased from 45.9 to 31.7 kg/m2 for the proximal and from 45.8 to 33.1 kg/m2 for the distal approach. Co-morbidities decreased after surgery in both groups; the prevalence of diabetes, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia at all time points was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Proximal and distal laparoscopic gastric bypass operations are feasible and safe, with no differences in weight loss or reduction of co-morbidity in unselected morbidly obese patients.

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
DDC:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2008
Deposited On:18 Dec 2008 15:09
Last Modified:28 Nov 2013 00:22
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:0007-1323
Publisher DOI:10.1002/bjs.6297
PubMed ID:18844274
Citations:Web of Science®. Times Cited: 20
Google Scholar™
Scopus®. Citation Count: 23

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page