Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, July the 26th 2016, 07:00-10:00

ZORA's new graphical user interface will be relaunched (For further infos watch out slideshow ZORA: Neues Look & Feel). There will be short interrupts on ZORA Service between 07:00am and 10:00 am. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-8310

Müller, M K; Räder, S; Wildi, S; Hauser, R; Clavien, P A; Weber, M (2008). Long-term follow-up of proximal versus distal laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. British Journal of Surgery, 95(11):1375-1379.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher


BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastric bypass is the 'gold standard' for treatment of morbidly obese patients in many centres. There is debate regarding the optimal length for small bowel limbs. This study aimed to determine whether the proximal or distal approach is better. METHODS: Twenty-five patients undergoing primary distal gastric bypass in 2000-2002 were randomly matched for age, sex and preoperative body mass index (BMI) with 25 patients having a primary proximal bypass. All distal operations were performed laparoscopically; one proximal procedure was converted to open surgery. RESULTS: Mean operating time was 170 min for proximal and 242 min for distal bypasses (P = 0.004); median hospital stay was similar in the two groups. There were no deaths and the overall complication rate was similar, as was weight loss at 4 years: BMI decreased from 45.9 to 31.7 kg/m2 for the proximal and from 45.8 to 33.1 kg/m2 for the distal approach. Co-morbidities decreased after surgery in both groups; the prevalence of diabetes, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia at all time points was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Proximal and distal laparoscopic gastric bypass operations are feasible and safe, with no differences in weight loss or reduction of co-morbidity in unselected morbidly obese patients.


24 citations in Web of Science®
31 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



2 downloads since deposited on 18 Dec 2008
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Deposited On:18 Dec 2008 15:09
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:43
Publisher DOI:10.1002/bjs.6297
PubMed ID:18844274

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page