Quick Search:

uzh logo
Browse by:

Zurich Open Repository and Archive

Maintenance: Tuesday, July the 26th 2016, 07:00-10:00

ZORA's new graphical user interface will be relaunched (For further infos watch out slideshow ZORA: Neues Look & Feel). There will be short interrupts on ZORA Service between 07:00am and 10:00 am. Please be patient.

Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-9007

Wade, A; Kurmanavicius, J (2009). Creating unbiased cross-sectional covariate-related reference ranges from serial correlated measurements. Biostatistics, 10(1):147-154.

[img] PDF - Registered users only
View at publisher


Cross-sectional covariate-related reference ranges are widely used in clinical medicine to put individual observations in the context of population values. Usually, such reference ranges are created from data sets of independent observations. If multiple measurements per individual are available, then ignoring the within-person correlation between repeats will lead to overestimation of centile precision. Furthermore, if abnormal measurements have triggered more frequent assessment, the data set will be biased thus producing biased centiles. Where multiple measures per individual exist, the methods commonly used are either randomly or systematically to select one observation per individual or to model individual trajectories and combine these. The first of these approaches may result in discarding a large proportion of the available data and may itself cause bias and the latter requires the form of the changes within individuals to be characterized. We have developed an approach to the modeling of the median, spread, and skew across individuals using maximum likelihood, which can incorporate correlations between dependent observations. Heavily biased data sets are simulated to illustrate how the methodology can eliminate the biases inherent in the data collection process and produce valid centiles plus estimates of the within-person correlations. The "select one per individual" approach is shown to be liable to bias and to produce less precise centiles. We recommend that the maximum likelihood method incorporating correlations be used with existing data sets. Furthermore, this is a potentially more efficient approach to be considered when planning the future collection of data solely for the purposes of creating cross-sectional covariate-related reference ranges.


2 citations in Web of Science®
2 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™



3 downloads since deposited on 06 Apr 2009
0 downloads since 12 months

Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Obstetrics
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Date:1 January 2009
Deposited On:06 Apr 2009 12:52
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:45
Publisher:Oxford University Press
Publisher DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxn022
PubMed ID:18599515

Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item

Repository Staff Only: item control page