Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-9109
D'Ambros, M; Gall, H C; Lanza, M; Pinzger, M (2008). Analyzing software repositories to understand software evolution. In: Mens, T; Demeyer, S. Software Evolution. Heidelberg, Germany, 37-67. ISBN 978-3-540-76439-7.
Software repositories such as versioning systems, defect tracking systems, and archived communication between project personnel are used to help manage the progress of
software projects. Software practitioners and researchers increasingly recognize the potential benefit of mining this information to support the maintenance of software systems, improve software design or reuse, and empirically validate novel ideas and techniques. Research is now proceeding to uncover ways in which mining these repositories can help to understand software development, to support predictions about software development, and to plan various evolutionary aspects of software projects.
This chapter presents several analysis and visualization techniques to understand software evolution by exploiting the rich sources of artifacts that are available. Based on the data models that need to be developed to cover sources such as modification and bug reports we describe how to use a Release History Database for evolution analysis. For that we present approaches to analyze developer effort for particular software entities. Further we present change coupling analyses that can reveal hidden change dependencies among software entities. Finally, we
show how to investigate architectural shortcomings over many releases and to identify trends in the evolution. Kiviat graphs can be effectively used to visualize such analysis results.
|Item Type:||Book Section, refereed, original work|
|Communities & Collections:||03 Faculty of Economics > Department of Informatics|
|DDC:||000 Computer science, knowledge & systems|
|Deposited On:||23 Dec 2008 13:14|
|Last Modified:||09 Jul 2012 03:31|
|Additional Information:||The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com|
Scopus®. Citation Count: 12
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page