UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Swiss consensus guidelines for hysterectomy. Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Switzerland


Schilling, Julian; Wyss, P; Faisst, Karin; Gutzwiller, Felix; Haller, U (1999). Swiss consensus guidelines for hysterectomy. Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Switzerland. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 64(3):297-305.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The quality of the indication for hysterectomy is widely discussed at present. In early 1996, the committee for quality assurance of the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics decided to set up nationally accepted guidelines for the indication of hysterectomy.
METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used. In a first step, general guidelines and actions prior to hysterectomy were defined. An expert panel of 17 Swiss gynecologists rated 74 frequent indications, twice for appropriateness (more benefits than risks for the patient), once for necessity (n = 34; procedure has to be offered or discussed with the patient), and outlined suggestions to be performed prior to hysterectomy.
RESULTS: In a home rating round before the first panel met, there was an agreement rate of 48%. In 45% we observed neither agreement nor disagreement; in 7% we found disagreement. After the panel discussion 89% of experts agreed, 11% were indeterminate, and there was no disagreement. The necessity ratings showed agreement in 68% while 32% were indeterminate. The average median rating on a 1-9 point scale (1 = extremely inappropriate, 9 = extremely appropriate or necessary) was 5.4 over all single indications for appropriateness and 7.8 in single indications for necessity. After a second panel for consensus all panelists agreed on both appropriateness and necessity.
CONCLUSION: The results of the appropriateness and necessity consensus presented in this paper reflect the findings of a 17 member Swiss panel. This joint effort by a medical society may be a step towards the direction of a peer controlled healthcare system.

OBJECTIVE: The quality of the indication for hysterectomy is widely discussed at present. In early 1996, the committee for quality assurance of the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics decided to set up nationally accepted guidelines for the indication of hysterectomy.
METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used. In a first step, general guidelines and actions prior to hysterectomy were defined. An expert panel of 17 Swiss gynecologists rated 74 frequent indications, twice for appropriateness (more benefits than risks for the patient), once for necessity (n = 34; procedure has to be offered or discussed with the patient), and outlined suggestions to be performed prior to hysterectomy.
RESULTS: In a home rating round before the first panel met, there was an agreement rate of 48%. In 45% we observed neither agreement nor disagreement; in 7% we found disagreement. After the panel discussion 89% of experts agreed, 11% were indeterminate, and there was no disagreement. The necessity ratings showed agreement in 68% while 32% were indeterminate. The average median rating on a 1-9 point scale (1 = extremely inappropriate, 9 = extremely appropriate or necessary) was 5.4 over all single indications for appropriateness and 7.8 in single indications for necessity. After a second panel for consensus all panelists agreed on both appropriateness and necessity.
CONCLUSION: The results of the appropriateness and necessity consensus presented in this paper reflect the findings of a 17 member Swiss panel. This joint effort by a medical society may be a step towards the direction of a peer controlled healthcare system.

Citations

4 citations in Web of Science®
12 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:1999
Deposited On:10 Jun 2014 16:32
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 17:54
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0020-7292
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00246-X
PubMed ID:10366053

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations