Permanent URL to this publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-9803
Neuner-Jehle, S; Wegwarth, O; Steurer, J (2008). Sagt ein Bild mehr als tausend Worte? Risikokommunikation in der ärztlichen Praxis: Vor- und Nachteile der unterschiedlichen Methoden. Praxis, 97(12):669-676.
PDF - Registered users only
|PDF - Registered users only|
Communication about risk, e.g. cardiovascular risk, is a central task of physicians in their daily practice. In this paper we summarize the different methods of risk communication published in the literature. The different methods and their particular advantages and shortcomings are described and some recommendations are formulated. The most significant of them are: verbal qualifiers like, your risk for a cardiovascular event is moderate, is imprecise and difficult to interpret. Information about risk in numerical form is more comprehensible when delivered in natural frequencies compared to percentages, pictorial representations contribute to a better understanding. Probably not one single mode of representation is the most effective way to convey information about risk, but a combination of methods.
|Other titles:||Is one picture worth a thousand words? Risk communication in primary care: advantages and shortcomings of different methods|
|Item Type:||Journal Article, refereed, further contribution|
|Communities & Collections:||04 Faculty of Medicine > The Horten-Center for Applied Research and Science|
|DDC:||610 Medicine & health|
|Deposited On:||07 Jan 2009 20:46|
|Last Modified:||23 Nov 2012 17:47|
Users (please log in): suggest update or correction for this item
Repository Staff Only: item control page