Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Hat Plato in der “ungeschriebenen Lehre“ eine “dogmatische Metaphysik und Systematik“ vertreten? Einige Bemerkungen zum Status Quaestionis


Ferber, Rafael (1993). Hat Plato in der “ungeschriebenen Lehre“ eine “dogmatische Metaphysik und Systematik“ vertreten? Einige Bemerkungen zum Status Quaestionis. Méthexis, Revista Argentina de Filosofia antigua:37-54.

Abstract

The paper gives an overview of the philosophical positions regarding Plato’s so-called unwritten doctrines and the systematic goal of his philosophy. One group of commentators (especially the Tübingen school with Hans Krämer and Konrad Gaiser) argues that in these doctrines Plato has a closed (finite) concept of philosophy, while another group, in the tradition of Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher and August Wilhelm Schlegel (for example, Ernst Heitsch, Margarita Isnardi-Parente and Wolfgang Kullmann), denies the philosophical relevance of the unwritten doctrines and favours an open (infinite) concept of philosophy which they find mainly in the dialogues. The author discusses and criticizes H. Krämer’s position and tries to show that a third position between finitism and infinitism is possible, that is, an approximation of the presupposed truth, a position anticipated in the “scepsi costrutttrice” of Luigi Stefanini’s “Platone”.

Abstract

The paper gives an overview of the philosophical positions regarding Plato’s so-called unwritten doctrines and the systematic goal of his philosophy. One group of commentators (especially the Tübingen school with Hans Krämer and Konrad Gaiser) argues that in these doctrines Plato has a closed (finite) concept of philosophy, while another group, in the tradition of Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher and August Wilhelm Schlegel (for example, Ernst Heitsch, Margarita Isnardi-Parente and Wolfgang Kullmann), denies the philosophical relevance of the unwritten doctrines and favours an open (infinite) concept of philosophy which they find mainly in the dialogues. The author discusses and criticizes H. Krämer’s position and tries to show that a third position between finitism and infinitism is possible, that is, an approximation of the presupposed truth, a position anticipated in the “scepsi costrutttrice” of Luigi Stefanini’s “Platone”.

Statistics

Downloads

36 downloads since deposited on 27 Feb 2015
8 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Philosophy
Dewey Decimal Classification:100 Philosophy
Language:German
Date:1993
Deposited On:27 Feb 2015 13:07
Last Modified:08 Dec 2017 12:16
Publisher:Academia Verlag, St. Augustin
ISSN:0327-0289

Download

Download PDF  'Hat Plato in der “ungeschriebenen Lehre“ eine “dogmatische Metaphysik und Systematik“ vertreten? Einige Bemerkungen zum Status Quaestionis'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Language: German
Filetype: PDF
Size: 7MB
Download PDF  'Hat Plato in der “ungeschriebenen Lehre“ eine “dogmatische Metaphysik und Systematik“ vertreten? Einige Bemerkungen zum Status Quaestionis'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Language: Spanish
Filetype: PDF (Spanish Translation by C. Eggers Lan)
Size: 1MB