Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty


Helmy, N; Anglin, C; Greidanus, N V; Masri, B A (2008). To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 466(11):2775-2783.

Abstract

The management of the patellar articular surface at the time of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. We used expected-value decision analysis to determine whether the patella should be resurfaced in TKA, and also whether secondary resurfacing on an unresurfaced patella is worthwhile. Outcome probabilities and utility values were derived from randomized controlled trials only. A decision tree was constructed and fold-back analysis was performed to ascertain the best treatment path. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect on decision-making of varying outcome probabilities and utilities. Our model showed patellar resurfacing is the best management strategy for the patella at the time of primary TKA. This decision is robust to changes in the specific data: the best path would remain the same as long as the incidence of persistent anterior knee pain (AKP) with resurfacing remains less than 29% (current mean, 12%) or the incidence of AKP after nonresurfacing falls below 12% (current mean, 26%). Delayed (ie, secondary) patellar resurfacing for ongoing patellar pain provides inferior results for the majority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, decision analysis. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract

The management of the patellar articular surface at the time of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. We used expected-value decision analysis to determine whether the patella should be resurfaced in TKA, and also whether secondary resurfacing on an unresurfaced patella is worthwhile. Outcome probabilities and utility values were derived from randomized controlled trials only. A decision tree was constructed and fold-back analysis was performed to ascertain the best treatment path. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect on decision-making of varying outcome probabilities and utilities. Our model showed patellar resurfacing is the best management strategy for the patella at the time of primary TKA. This decision is robust to changes in the specific data: the best path would remain the same as long as the incidence of persistent anterior knee pain (AKP) with resurfacing remains less than 29% (current mean, 12%) or the incidence of AKP after nonresurfacing falls below 12% (current mean, 26%). Delayed (ie, secondary) patellar resurfacing for ongoing patellar pain provides inferior results for the majority of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, decision analysis. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Statistics

Citations

28 citations in Web of Science®
38 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 23 Jan 2009
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:November 2008
Deposited On:23 Jan 2009 15:09
Last Modified:06 Dec 2017 17:17
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0009-921X
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0420-3
PubMed ID:18726657

Download