Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

A comprehensive assessment of MODIS-derived GPP for forest ecosystems using the site-level FLUXNET database


Tang, Xuguang; Li, Hengpeng; Huang, Ni; Liu, Xinyang; Xu, Xibao; Ding, Zhi; Xie, Jing (2015). A comprehensive assessment of MODIS-derived GPP for forest ecosystems using the site-level FLUXNET database. Environmental Earth Sciences, 74(7):5907-5918.

Abstract

Accurate and continuous monitoring of forest production is critical for quantifying the dynamics of regional-to-global carbon cycles. MOD17A2 provides high frequency observations of terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) and is widely used to evaluate the spatiotemporal variability and responses to changing climate. However, the effectiveness of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) in measuring GPP is directly constrained by the large uncertainties in the modeling process, specifically for complicated and extensive forest ecosystems. Although there have been plenty of studies to verify the MODIS GPP product with groundbased measurements covering a range of biome types, few have comprehensively validated the performance of MODIS estimates (C5.5) for diverse forests. Thus, this study examined the degree of correspondence between the MODIS-derived GPP and the EC-measured GPP at seasonal and interannual time scales for the main forest ecosystems, encompassing evergreen broadleaf forest (EBF), evergreen needleleaf forest (ENF), deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF), and mixed forest (MF) relying on 16 flux towers with a total dataset of 68 site-years. Overall, the site-specific evaluation of multi-year mean annual GPP estimates indicates that the current MODIS product works more significantly for DBF and MF, less for ENF, and least for EBF. Except for the tropical forest, MODIS estimates could capture the broad trends of GPP at an 8-day time scale for the other sites. At the seasonal time scale, the highest performance was observed in ENF, followed by MF and DBF, and the least performance was observed in EBF. Trend analyses also revealed the weak performance in EBF and DBF. This study suggested that current MODIS GPP estimates still need to improve the quality of different upstream inputs in addition to the algorithm for accurately quantifying forest production.

Abstract

Accurate and continuous monitoring of forest production is critical for quantifying the dynamics of regional-to-global carbon cycles. MOD17A2 provides high frequency observations of terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) and is widely used to evaluate the spatiotemporal variability and responses to changing climate. However, the effectiveness of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) in measuring GPP is directly constrained by the large uncertainties in the modeling process, specifically for complicated and extensive forest ecosystems. Although there have been plenty of studies to verify the MODIS GPP product with groundbased measurements covering a range of biome types, few have comprehensively validated the performance of MODIS estimates (C5.5) for diverse forests. Thus, this study examined the degree of correspondence between the MODIS-derived GPP and the EC-measured GPP at seasonal and interannual time scales for the main forest ecosystems, encompassing evergreen broadleaf forest (EBF), evergreen needleleaf forest (ENF), deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF), and mixed forest (MF) relying on 16 flux towers with a total dataset of 68 site-years. Overall, the site-specific evaluation of multi-year mean annual GPP estimates indicates that the current MODIS product works more significantly for DBF and MF, less for ENF, and least for EBF. Except for the tropical forest, MODIS estimates could capture the broad trends of GPP at an 8-day time scale for the other sites. At the seasonal time scale, the highest performance was observed in ENF, followed by MF and DBF, and the least performance was observed in EBF. Trend analyses also revealed the weak performance in EBF and DBF. This study suggested that current MODIS GPP estimates still need to improve the quality of different upstream inputs in addition to the algorithm for accurately quantifying forest production.

Statistics

Citations

5 citations in Web of Science®
4 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 07 Jan 2016
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:07 Faculty of Science > Institute of Geography
Dewey Decimal Classification:910 Geography & travel
Date:2015
Deposited On:07 Jan 2016 07:48
Last Modified:29 Apr 2016 07:33
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:1866-6280
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4615-0

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 1MB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations