Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Impact of incorrect filling of citrate blood sampling tubes on thromboelastometry


Haas, Thorsten; Spielmann, Nelly; Cushing, Melissa (2015). Impact of incorrect filling of citrate blood sampling tubes on thromboelastometry. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 75(8):717-719.

Abstract

BACKGROUND ROTEM(®) test results can be affected by the citrate to blood ratio in the tested sample. Overfilling or underfilling specimen tubes can change this ratio. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the impact of under- and overfilling citrate test tubes on ROTEM(®) EXTEM measurements. RESULTS Overall repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant differences of CT (p = 0.004), CFT (p = 0.005), A5 (p = 0.001), A10 (p <0.001), and MCF (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparison revealed that underfilling significantly altered the results of those parameters reflecting functional clot firmness (A5, A10, and MCF), while overfilling led to a prolongation of the CT results only. No differences were observed for alpha angle and maximum lysis. CONCLUSION Both underfilling and overfilling specimen tubes have significant influence on the results of the ROTEM(®) EXTEM test, although the small observed bias is likely of limited clinical relevance. However, it seems prudent to limit the maximum allowed difference in filling to less than ± 10%. All ROTEM(®) operators should be aware of this pre-analytical variable.

Abstract

BACKGROUND ROTEM(®) test results can be affected by the citrate to blood ratio in the tested sample. Overfilling or underfilling specimen tubes can change this ratio. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the impact of under- and overfilling citrate test tubes on ROTEM(®) EXTEM measurements. RESULTS Overall repeated measures ANOVA demonstrated significant differences of CT (p = 0.004), CFT (p = 0.005), A5 (p = 0.001), A10 (p <0.001), and MCF (p < 0.001). Pairwise comparison revealed that underfilling significantly altered the results of those parameters reflecting functional clot firmness (A5, A10, and MCF), while overfilling led to a prolongation of the CT results only. No differences were observed for alpha angle and maximum lysis. CONCLUSION Both underfilling and overfilling specimen tubes have significant influence on the results of the ROTEM(®) EXTEM test, although the small observed bias is likely of limited clinical relevance. However, it seems prudent to limit the maximum allowed difference in filling to less than ± 10%. All ROTEM(®) operators should be aware of this pre-analytical variable.

Statistics

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2015
Deposited On:08 Jan 2016 15:16
Last Modified:08 Dec 2017 16:46
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0036-5513
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2015.1091092
PubMed ID:26426852

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher