Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Impact of oxygen sources on performance of the Ventrain(®) ventilation device in an in vitro set-up


Schmidt, A R; Ruetzler, K; Haas, T; Schmitz, A; Weiss, M (2016). Impact of oxygen sources on performance of the Ventrain(®) ventilation device in an in vitro set-up. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 60(2):241-249.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Ventrain(®) (Dolphys Medical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) is a disposable handheld ventilation device allowing active inspiration and expiration through a transtracheal catheter. This study investigated Ventrain(®) 's performance when used with different clinical oxygen sources in an in vitro set-up. METHODS Three anesthesia oxygen sources (wall-mounted flowmeter, respirator oxygen outlet port, and anesthesia ventilator circuit) were used at gas flow rates of 6, 9, 12, and 15 l/min. First, the sources' driving pressures (DP), the insufflation pressure (IP), and the flow at the catheter tip were measured using a gas flow analyzer. Tidal volumes (VT) delivered by the Ventrain(®) were assessed by the ASL5000 test lung (respiratory rate: 15 min(-1) , I:E = 1:1, compliance: 100 ml/cmH2 O, resistance: 3.06 cmH2 O/l/s). RESULTS VT ranged from 82 to 483 ml for inspiration and 82 to 419 ml for expiration. Measured IP, flow, and VT were less dependent on the set gas flow rate but more on the source's DP. With rising DP the IP, the flow at the catheter tip and consequently VT increased. At an approximate target I:E ratio of 1:1, the ratio of inspiratory to expiratory VT increased with higher DP and gas flow rates. CONCLUSION The oxygen sources resulted in clinically different IP, flows, and VT delivered by the Ventrain(®) at given gas flow rates. This needs to be considered in a clinical emergency situation. Integrating an adjustable pressure valve into Ventrain(®) to allow regulation of the lowest necessary IP would make its use safer.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The Ventrain(®) (Dolphys Medical, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) is a disposable handheld ventilation device allowing active inspiration and expiration through a transtracheal catheter. This study investigated Ventrain(®) 's performance when used with different clinical oxygen sources in an in vitro set-up. METHODS Three anesthesia oxygen sources (wall-mounted flowmeter, respirator oxygen outlet port, and anesthesia ventilator circuit) were used at gas flow rates of 6, 9, 12, and 15 l/min. First, the sources' driving pressures (DP), the insufflation pressure (IP), and the flow at the catheter tip were measured using a gas flow analyzer. Tidal volumes (VT) delivered by the Ventrain(®) were assessed by the ASL5000 test lung (respiratory rate: 15 min(-1) , I:E = 1:1, compliance: 100 ml/cmH2 O, resistance: 3.06 cmH2 O/l/s). RESULTS VT ranged from 82 to 483 ml for inspiration and 82 to 419 ml for expiration. Measured IP, flow, and VT were less dependent on the set gas flow rate but more on the source's DP. With rising DP the IP, the flow at the catheter tip and consequently VT increased. At an approximate target I:E ratio of 1:1, the ratio of inspiratory to expiratory VT increased with higher DP and gas flow rates. CONCLUSION The oxygen sources resulted in clinically different IP, flows, and VT delivered by the Ventrain(®) at given gas flow rates. This needs to be considered in a clinical emergency situation. Integrating an adjustable pressure valve into Ventrain(®) to allow regulation of the lowest necessary IP would make its use safer.

Statistics

Citations

4 citations in Web of Science®
4 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Institute of Anesthesiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2016
Deposited On:13 Jan 2016 09:10
Last Modified:08 Dec 2017 16:47
Publisher:Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN:0001-5172
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12663
PubMed ID:26612252

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher