Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Quantitative muscle MRI: A powerful surrogate outcome measure in Duchenne muscular dystrophy


Bonati, Ulrike; Hafner, Patricia; Schädelin, Sabine; Schmid, Maurice; Naduvilekoot Devasia, Arjith; Schroeder, Jonas; Zuesli, Stephanie; Pohlman, Urs; Neuhaus, Cornelia; Klein, Andrea; Sinnreich, Michael; Haas, Tanja; Gloor, Monika; Bieri, Oliver; Fischmann, Arne; Fischer, Dirk (2015). Quantitative muscle MRI: A powerful surrogate outcome measure in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD, 25(9):679-685.

Abstract

In muscular dystrophies quantitative muscle MRI (qMRI) detects disease progression more sensitively than clinical scores. This prospective one year observational study compared qMRI with clinical scores in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) to investigate if qMRI can serve as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials. In 20 DMD patients the motor function measure (MFM) total and subscores (D1-D3) were done for physical examination, and the fat fraction (MFF) of thigh muscle qMRI was obtained using the two-point Dixon method. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated for all measures. Sample size estimation (SS) was done modelling assumed treatment effects. Ambulant patients <7 years at inclusion improved in the MFM total and D1 score (ES 1.1 and 1.0). Ambulant patients >7 years (highest ES in the MFM D1 subscore (1.2)), and non-ambulant patients (highest ES in the total MFM score (0.7)) worsened. In comparison the ES of QMRI was much larger, e.g. SS estimations for qMRI data were up to 17 fold smaller compared to the MFM total score and up to 7 fold to the D1 subscore, respectively. QMRI shows pathophysiological changes in DMD and might serve as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials.

Abstract

In muscular dystrophies quantitative muscle MRI (qMRI) detects disease progression more sensitively than clinical scores. This prospective one year observational study compared qMRI with clinical scores in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) to investigate if qMRI can serve as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials. In 20 DMD patients the motor function measure (MFM) total and subscores (D1-D3) were done for physical examination, and the fat fraction (MFF) of thigh muscle qMRI was obtained using the two-point Dixon method. Effect sizes (ES) were calculated for all measures. Sample size estimation (SS) was done modelling assumed treatment effects. Ambulant patients <7 years at inclusion improved in the MFM total and D1 score (ES 1.1 and 1.0). Ambulant patients >7 years (highest ES in the MFM D1 subscore (1.2)), and non-ambulant patients (highest ES in the total MFM score (0.7)) worsened. In comparison the ES of QMRI was much larger, e.g. SS estimations for qMRI data were up to 17 fold smaller compared to the MFM total score and up to 7 fold to the D1 subscore, respectively. QMRI shows pathophysiological changes in DMD and might serve as a surrogate outcome measure in clinical trials.

Statistics

Citations

15 citations in Web of Science®
15 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 21 Jan 2016
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Children's Hospital Zurich > Medical Clinic
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:September 2015
Deposited On:21 Jan 2016 10:35
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 19:53
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0960-8966
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2015.05.006
PubMed ID:26096788

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Content: Published Version
Filetype: PDF - Registered users only
Size: 737kB
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations