Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Parental education and public reason: why comprehensive enrolment is justified


Giesinger, Johannes (2013). Parental education and public reason: why comprehensive enrolment is justified. Theory and Research in Education, 11(3):269-279.

Abstract

Matthew Clayton claims that ‘comprehensive enrolment’ – raising one’s children in accordance with one’s own conception of the good – is illegitimate. In his argument against comprehensive enrolment, Clayton refers to Rawls’s idea of public reason. In a recent response to Clayton, Christina Cameron not only rejects Clayton’s conclusions, but also denies that the idea of public reason can be applied to the parent–child relationship. This article responds to both Clayton and Cameron: It is stated, first, that political arrangements concerning children’s upbringing must be acceptable in the light of public reason. Second, it is claimed that comprehensive enrolment can nevertheless be considered as legitimate

Abstract

Matthew Clayton claims that ‘comprehensive enrolment’ – raising one’s children in accordance with one’s own conception of the good – is illegitimate. In his argument against comprehensive enrolment, Clayton refers to Rawls’s idea of public reason. In a recent response to Clayton, Christina Cameron not only rejects Clayton’s conclusions, but also denies that the idea of public reason can be applied to the parent–child relationship. This article responds to both Clayton and Cameron: It is stated, first, that political arrangements concerning children’s upbringing must be acceptable in the light of public reason. Second, it is claimed that comprehensive enrolment can nevertheless be considered as legitimate

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 25 Feb 2016
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:01 Faculty of Theology > Center for Ethics
06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Philosophy
Dewey Decimal Classification:100 Philosophy
Language:English
Date:November 2013
Deposited On:25 Feb 2016 14:09
Last Modified:08 Dec 2017 19:10
Publisher:Sage Publications Ltd.
ISSN:1477-8785
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513498177
Related URLs:http://tre.sagepub.com/content/11/3.toc (Publisher)

Download