Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Scaling Up Democracy with E-Collection?


Serdült, Uwe; Mendez, Fernando; Harris, Maya; Su Seo, Hyeon (2016). Scaling Up Democracy with E-Collection? In: CeDem 2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2015, Danube University Krems, Austria, 18 May 2016 - 20 May 2016, 25-31.

Abstract

In most advanced democracies there is a host of ancillary participatory instruments that operate "between elections". The aim of such participatory instruments is to allow citizens to put new issues on the policy agenda. The range of so-called "between election" participatory instruments that are the focus of this paper can be grouped around three basic categories, the petition, the agenda initiative and the citizens' initiative. This paper deals mostly with the extent to which new technologies are used to enhance the functioning of the endorsement mechanism, so called e-collecting. Our core argument is that harnessing the full potential of the "e" dimension, especially the e-collecting aspect, will be conditional on two factors: (1) the specificity of the participatory instrument and (2) the institutionalization of the instrument, namely whether it is an established instrument or whether it is a recently introduces democratic innovation.

Abstract

In most advanced democracies there is a host of ancillary participatory instruments that operate "between elections". The aim of such participatory instruments is to allow citizens to put new issues on the policy agenda. The range of so-called "between election" participatory instruments that are the focus of this paper can be grouped around three basic categories, the petition, the agenda initiative and the citizens' initiative. This paper deals mostly with the extent to which new technologies are used to enhance the functioning of the endorsement mechanism, so called e-collecting. Our core argument is that harnessing the full potential of the "e" dimension, especially the e-collecting aspect, will be conditional on two factors: (1) the specificity of the participatory instrument and (2) the institutionalization of the instrument, namely whether it is an established instrument or whether it is a recently introduces democratic innovation.

Statistics

Altmetrics

Downloads

51 downloads since deposited on 27 May 2016
26 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper), not refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:02 Faculty of Law > Centre for Democracy Studies Aarau (C2D)
Dewey Decimal Classification:340 Law
Uncontrolled Keywords:e-democracy; e-participation; e-petition; e-collection
Language:English
Event End Date:20 May 2016
Deposited On:27 May 2016 06:13
Last Modified:24 Aug 2017 10:42
Publisher:s.n.
ISBN:978-1-5090-1043-1
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.13

Download

Preview Icon on Download
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 239kB
View at publisher

Article Networks

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations