Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Visual Axis, blind spot, yellow spot - controversies over almost 400 years


Gloor, Balder P (2012). Visual Axis, blind spot, yellow spot - controversies over almost 400 years. Anales del Instituto Barraquer, 50(3-4):75-92.

Abstract

Fernando Buzzi's detection of the yelow spot in 1782 passed almost unnoticed, but when Theodor Soemmering became aware of the macula lutea in 1791 and postulated that there was a hole at its center, he triggered long -lasting controversies. He questioned Edmé Marriotte's explanation of the blind spot and predicted the collapse of Haller's doctrine on the topography of the visual axis. This invite a short review of the supposed position of the visual axis since the Arabs' Golden Age up the modern-day histological description of the fovea by Heinrich Müller. The ophthalmoscope didn't bring clarification. Indeed, there was neither a hole nor any yelow color in the macular region ! Slowly, the macular yellow enjoyed its rebirth with the observations of Schmidt-Rimpler in 1875 and of Dimmer in 1894, but then Gullstrand started a controversy of Homeric dimensions, denying the existence of a yelow pigments in the retina, initaially between 1902 and 1908 against Schmidt-Rimpler and Dimmer, ans subsequently in 1918 against Votgt, who had shown the macular yelow by ophtalmoscopy in red free light. Nordenson made an attempt to back up Gullstrand, his compatriot, in 1949. but Wald had already proven the existence of lutein in the macula by spectroscopy in 1945, wich opened up the way for the development of instruments and methods to measure xanthophyll content during life, such as Raman spectroscopy, ophthalmo-spectomety and heterochromic flicker photometry (HFP) to investigate correlations between xanthophyll content and senile macular degeneration in our time.

Abstract

Fernando Buzzi's detection of the yelow spot in 1782 passed almost unnoticed, but when Theodor Soemmering became aware of the macula lutea in 1791 and postulated that there was a hole at its center, he triggered long -lasting controversies. He questioned Edmé Marriotte's explanation of the blind spot and predicted the collapse of Haller's doctrine on the topography of the visual axis. This invite a short review of the supposed position of the visual axis since the Arabs' Golden Age up the modern-day histological description of the fovea by Heinrich Müller. The ophthalmoscope didn't bring clarification. Indeed, there was neither a hole nor any yelow color in the macular region ! Slowly, the macular yellow enjoyed its rebirth with the observations of Schmidt-Rimpler in 1875 and of Dimmer in 1894, but then Gullstrand started a controversy of Homeric dimensions, denying the existence of a yelow pigments in the retina, initaially between 1902 and 1908 against Schmidt-Rimpler and Dimmer, ans subsequently in 1918 against Votgt, who had shown the macular yelow by ophtalmoscopy in red free light. Nordenson made an attempt to back up Gullstrand, his compatriot, in 1949. but Wald had already proven the existence of lutein in the macula by spectroscopy in 1945, wich opened up the way for the development of instruments and methods to measure xanthophyll content during life, such as Raman spectroscopy, ophthalmo-spectomety and heterochromic flicker photometry (HFP) to investigate correlations between xanthophyll content and senile macular degeneration in our time.

Statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, further contribution
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Ophthalmology Clinic
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Date:2012
Deposited On:02 Jun 2016 12:34
Last Modified:13 Jun 2016 12:42
Publisher:Instituto Barraquer
ISSN:0020-3645
Official URL:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5412064

Download

Full text not available from this repository.