Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Validation of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire - Revised in six European countries


Fernandes-Jesus, Maria; Beccaria, Franca; Demant, Jakob; Fleig, Lena; Menezes, Isabel; Scholz, Urte; de Visser, Richard; Cooke, Richard (2016). Validation of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire - Revised in six European countries. Addictive Behaviors, 62:91-98.

Abstract

Objectives.
Extending individual planning of health behaviour change to the level of the
dyad, dyadic planning refers to a target person and a planning partner jointly planning the
target person’s health behaviour change. To date, predictors of dyadic planning have not
been systematically investigated. Integrating cognitive predictors of individual planning
with four established predictor domains of social support provision, we propose a
framework of predictors of dyadic planning. Including target persons’ and partners’
perspectives, we examine these predictor domains in the context of prostate cancer
patients’ rehabilitative pelvic floor exercise (PFE) following radical prostatectomy.

Design.
Longitudinal data from 175 patients and their partners were analysed in a study
with four post-surgery assessments across 6 months.

Methods.
PFE-related dyadic planning was assessed from both partners together with
indicators from four predictor domains: context, target person, partner, and relationship
factors. Individual planning and social support served as covariates.

Results.
Findings from two-level models nesting repeated assessments in individuals
showed that context (patients’ incontinence), target person (i.e., positive affect and self-
efficacy), and relationship factors (i.e., relationship satisfaction) were uniquely associated
with dyadic planning, whereas partner factors (i.e., positive and negative affects) were not.
Factors predicting patients’ and partners’ accounts of dyadic planning differed.

Conclusions.
Resembling prior findings on antecedents of support provision in this
context, partner factors did not prevail as unique predictors of dyadic planning,
whereas indicators from all other predictor domains did. To establish predictive
direction, future work should use lagged predictions with shorter intermeasurement
intervals.

Abstract

Objectives.
Extending individual planning of health behaviour change to the level of the
dyad, dyadic planning refers to a target person and a planning partner jointly planning the
target person’s health behaviour change. To date, predictors of dyadic planning have not
been systematically investigated. Integrating cognitive predictors of individual planning
with four established predictor domains of social support provision, we propose a
framework of predictors of dyadic planning. Including target persons’ and partners’
perspectives, we examine these predictor domains in the context of prostate cancer
patients’ rehabilitative pelvic floor exercise (PFE) following radical prostatectomy.

Design.
Longitudinal data from 175 patients and their partners were analysed in a study
with four post-surgery assessments across 6 months.

Methods.
PFE-related dyadic planning was assessed from both partners together with
indicators from four predictor domains: context, target person, partner, and relationship
factors. Individual planning and social support served as covariates.

Results.
Findings from two-level models nesting repeated assessments in individuals
showed that context (patients’ incontinence), target person (i.e., positive affect and self-
efficacy), and relationship factors (i.e., relationship satisfaction) were uniquely associated
with dyadic planning, whereas partner factors (i.e., positive and negative affects) were not.
Factors predicting patients’ and partners’ accounts of dyadic planning differed.

Conclusions.
Resembling prior findings on antecedents of support provision in this
context, partner factors did not prevail as unique predictors of dyadic planning,
whereas indicators from all other predictor domains did. To establish predictive
direction, future work should use lagged predictions with shorter intermeasurement
intervals.

Statistics

Citations

1 citation in Web of Science®
1 citation in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Psychology
Dewey Decimal Classification:150 Psychology
Language:English
Date:November 2016
Deposited On:30 Nov 2016 13:37
Last Modified:01 Dec 2016 02:03
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0306-4603
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.06.010
PubMed ID:27344012

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

TrendTerms

TrendTerms displays relevant terms of the abstract of this publication and related documents on a map. The terms and their relations were extracted from ZORA using word statistics. Their timelines are taken from ZORA as well. The bubble size of a term is proportional to the number of documents where the term occurs. Red, orange, yellow and green colors are used for terms that occur in the current document; red indicates high interlinkedness of a term with other terms, orange, yellow and green decreasing interlinkedness. Blue is used for terms that have a relation with the terms in this document, but occur in other documents.
You can navigate and zoom the map. Mouse-hovering a term displays its timeline, clicking it yields the associated documents.

Author Collaborations