Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Predictors of disagreement between prospectively ECG-triggered dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography and conventional coronary angiography


Muzzarelli, Stefano; Suerder, Daniel; Murzilli, Romina; Donato, Lucia; Pedrazzini, Giovanni; Pasotti, Elena; Moccetti, Tiziano; Klersy, Catherine; Faletra, Francesco Fulvio (2016). Predictors of disagreement between prospectively ECG-triggered dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography and conventional coronary angiography. European Journal of Radiology, 85(6):1138-1146.

Abstract

AIMS To identify causes of misinterpretation in second generation, dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS A retrospective re-interpretation was performed on 100 consecutive CCTA studies, previously performed with a 2×128 slice dual-source CT. Results were compared with coronary angiography (CA). CCTA and CA images were interpreted by 2 independent readers. At CCTA vessel diameter, image quality, plaque characteristics and localization (bifurcation vs. non) were described for all segments. Finally, aortic contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the total Agatston calcium score were quantified. Agreement between CCTA and CA was assessed with the Kappa statistic after categorizing the stenosis severity at significant (≥50%) and critical (≥70%) cut-offs, and independent predictors of disagreement were determined by multivariable logistic regression, including patient characteristics such as body mass index (BMI), heart rate (HR), age and gender. RESULTS Per-segment sensitivity and specificity at ≥50% and ≥70% stenosis was of 83-95%, and 73-97%, respectively. There was a substantial agreement between CCTA and CA (kappa-50%=0.78, SE=0.03; kappa-70%=0.72, SE=0.03). Worse motion-related quality score, smaller vessel diameter, calcification within the segment of interest and LAD location were independent predictors of disagreement at 50% stenosis. The same factors, excluded LAD location, in addition to bifurcation-location of the coronary lesion predicted misdiagnosis at 70% stenosis. HR per se and BMI did not predict disagreement. CONCLUSION According to the literature a substantial agreement between CCTA and CA was found. However, discrepancies exist and are mainly related with motion-related degradation of image quality, specific vessel anatomy and plaque characteristics. Awareness of such potential limitations may help guiding interpretation of CCTA.

Abstract

AIMS To identify causes of misinterpretation in second generation, dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS A retrospective re-interpretation was performed on 100 consecutive CCTA studies, previously performed with a 2×128 slice dual-source CT. Results were compared with coronary angiography (CA). CCTA and CA images were interpreted by 2 independent readers. At CCTA vessel diameter, image quality, plaque characteristics and localization (bifurcation vs. non) were described for all segments. Finally, aortic contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and the total Agatston calcium score were quantified. Agreement between CCTA and CA was assessed with the Kappa statistic after categorizing the stenosis severity at significant (≥50%) and critical (≥70%) cut-offs, and independent predictors of disagreement were determined by multivariable logistic regression, including patient characteristics such as body mass index (BMI), heart rate (HR), age and gender. RESULTS Per-segment sensitivity and specificity at ≥50% and ≥70% stenosis was of 83-95%, and 73-97%, respectively. There was a substantial agreement between CCTA and CA (kappa-50%=0.78, SE=0.03; kappa-70%=0.72, SE=0.03). Worse motion-related quality score, smaller vessel diameter, calcification within the segment of interest and LAD location were independent predictors of disagreement at 50% stenosis. The same factors, excluded LAD location, in addition to bifurcation-location of the coronary lesion predicted misdiagnosis at 70% stenosis. HR per se and BMI did not predict disagreement. CONCLUSION According to the literature a substantial agreement between CCTA and CA was found. However, discrepancies exist and are mainly related with motion-related degradation of image quality, specific vessel anatomy and plaque characteristics. Awareness of such potential limitations may help guiding interpretation of CCTA.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Cardiocentro Ticino
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:June 2016
Deposited On:08 Dec 2016 08:53
Last Modified:02 Feb 2018 10:55
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0720-048X
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.021
PubMed ID:27161064

Download

Full text not available from this repository.
View at publisher

Get full-text in a library