Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Gleaning: old name, new practice


Diković, Jovana (2016). Gleaning: old name, new practice. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 48(2):302-321.

Abstract

The practice of gleaning is linked to the centuries-old custom embedded in the customary laws of many people, according to which the master of the land holds the right to allow the poor to follow harvesters in the field and to gather and glean the fallen spears of grain. In this article, the new meaning of the practice of gleaning is analyzed by using an example of one Serbian village in Vojvodina province, Gaj, which is still predominately agricultural. In a strict sense, the name of the old practice is kept, but the essence of the practice itself and its symbolism have changed radically. In previous times, the term “gleaning” referred to the reciprocal social, economic and political relationship between the poor and the landowner. Today, in the context of the village of Gaj, it is mostly used as a euphemism for field theft. The article analyzes this gradual shift in diachronic and social-anthropological perspectives, aiming to depict and explain crucial changes in informal and formal institutions that have contributed to this current understanding of gleaning.

Abstract

The practice of gleaning is linked to the centuries-old custom embedded in the customary laws of many people, according to which the master of the land holds the right to allow the poor to follow harvesters in the field and to gather and glean the fallen spears of grain. In this article, the new meaning of the practice of gleaning is analyzed by using an example of one Serbian village in Vojvodina province, Gaj, which is still predominately agricultural. In a strict sense, the name of the old practice is kept, but the essence of the practice itself and its symbolism have changed radically. In previous times, the term “gleaning” referred to the reciprocal social, economic and political relationship between the poor and the landowner. Today, in the context of the village of Gaj, it is mostly used as a euphemism for field theft. The article analyzes this gradual shift in diachronic and social-anthropological perspectives, aiming to depict and explain crucial changes in informal and formal institutions that have contributed to this current understanding of gleaning.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Downloads

16 downloads since deposited on 14 Feb 2017
15 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Department of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies
Dewey Decimal Classification:790 Sports, games & entertainment
390 Customs, etiquette & folklore
300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology
Language:English
Date:2016
Deposited On:14 Feb 2017 14:33
Last Modified:02 Feb 2018 12:09
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0732-9113
Additional Information:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law on 2016, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/07329113.2016.1165501
OA Status:Green
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2016.1165501

Download

Download PDF  'Gleaning: old name, new practice'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 261kB
View at publisher