Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study


Aichmair, A; Moser, M; Bauer, M R; Bachmann, E; Snedeker, J G; Betz, M; Farshad, M (2017). Pull-out strength of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled thoracolumbar pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis of a randomized cadaveric study. European Spine Journal:Epub ahead of print.

Abstract

PURPOSE To assess the pull-out strength of thoracolumbar pedicle screws implanted via either a patient-specific template-guided or conventional free-hand fluoroscopically controlled technique in a randomized cadaveric study, and to evaluate the influence of local vertebral bone density, quantified by Hounsfield units (HU), on pedicle screw pull-out strength.
METHODS Thoracolumbar pedicles of three spine cadavers were instrumented using either a free-hand fluoroscopically controlled or a patient-specific template-guided technique. Preoperative bone density was quantified by HU measured on CT. Pedicle perforation was evaluated on postoperative CT scans by an independent and blinded radiologist. After dissected vertebrae were embedded in aluminum fixation devices, pull-out testing was initiated with a preload of 50 N and a constant displacement rate of 0.5 mm/s. Subgroup analyses were performed excluding pedicle screws with a pedicle breach (n = 47).
RESULTS Pull-out strength was significantly different with 549 ± 278 and 441 ± 289 N in the template-guided (n = 50) versus fluoroscopically controlled (n = 48) subgroups (p = 0.031), respectively. Subgroup analysis limited to screws with an intrapedicular trajectory revealed a tendency toward a higher pull-out strength in the template-guided (n = 30) versus fluoroscopically controlled screws (n = 21) with 587 ± 309 and 454 ± 269 N (p = 0.118), respectively. There was a trend toward a higher pull-out strength (709 ± 418 versus 420 ± 149 N) in vertebrae with a bone density of (>171 HU) versus (<133 HU), respectively (p = 0.061).
CONCLUSIONS There was a significantly higher pull-out strength of thoracolumbar pedicle screws when inserted via a patient-specific template-guided versus conventional free-hand fluoroscopically controlled technique, potentially associated with screw trajectory.

Abstract

PURPOSE To assess the pull-out strength of thoracolumbar pedicle screws implanted via either a patient-specific template-guided or conventional free-hand fluoroscopically controlled technique in a randomized cadaveric study, and to evaluate the influence of local vertebral bone density, quantified by Hounsfield units (HU), on pedicle screw pull-out strength.
METHODS Thoracolumbar pedicles of three spine cadavers were instrumented using either a free-hand fluoroscopically controlled or a patient-specific template-guided technique. Preoperative bone density was quantified by HU measured on CT. Pedicle perforation was evaluated on postoperative CT scans by an independent and blinded radiologist. After dissected vertebrae were embedded in aluminum fixation devices, pull-out testing was initiated with a preload of 50 N and a constant displacement rate of 0.5 mm/s. Subgroup analyses were performed excluding pedicle screws with a pedicle breach (n = 47).
RESULTS Pull-out strength was significantly different with 549 ± 278 and 441 ± 289 N in the template-guided (n = 50) versus fluoroscopically controlled (n = 48) subgroups (p = 0.031), respectively. Subgroup analysis limited to screws with an intrapedicular trajectory revealed a tendency toward a higher pull-out strength in the template-guided (n = 30) versus fluoroscopically controlled screws (n = 21) with 587 ± 309 and 454 ± 269 N (p = 0.118), respectively. There was a trend toward a higher pull-out strength (709 ± 418 versus 420 ± 149 N) in vertebrae with a bone density of (>171 HU) versus (<133 HU), respectively (p = 0.061).
CONCLUSIONS There was a significantly higher pull-out strength of thoracolumbar pedicle screws when inserted via a patient-specific template-guided versus conventional free-hand fluoroscopically controlled technique, potentially associated with screw trajectory.

Statistics

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 08 Mar 2017
1 download since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Balgrist University Hospital, Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Center
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:4 March 2017
Deposited On:08 Mar 2017 15:33
Last Modified:31 May 2017 07:39
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0940-6719
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5025-7
PubMed ID:28260125

Download