Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

In-depth analysis of interreader agreement and accuracy in categorical assessment of brown adipose tissue in (18)FDG-PET/CT


Becker, Anton S; Zellweger, Caroline; Schawkat, Khoschy; Bogdanovic, Sanja; Phi van, Valerie Doan; Nagel, Hannes W; Wolfrum, Christian; Burger, Irene A (2017). In-depth analysis of interreader agreement and accuracy in categorical assessment of brown adipose tissue in (18)FDG-PET/CT. European Journal of Radiology, 91:41-46.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interreader agreement of a three-tier craniocaudal grading system for brown fat activation and investigate the accuracy of the distinction between the three grades.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After IRB approval, 340 cases were retrospectively selected from patients undergoing (18)FDG-PET/CT between 2007 and 2015 at our institution, with 85 cases in each grade and 85 controls with no active brown fat. Three readers evaluated all cases independently. Furthermore standardized uptake values (SUV) measurements were performed by two readers in a subset of 53 cases. Agreement between the readers was assessed with Cohen's Kappa (k), the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Accuracy was assessed with Bland-Altman and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. A Bonferroni-corrected two-tailed p<0.016 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Agreement for BAT grade was excellent by all three metrics with k=0.83-0.89, CCC=0.83-0.89 and ICC=0.91-0.94. Bland-Altman analysis revealed only slight average over- or underestimation (-0.01-0.14) with the majority of disagreements within one grade. ROC analysis yielded slightly less accurate classification between higher vs. lower grades (Area under the ROC curves 0.78-0.84 vs. 0.88-0.92) but no significant differences between readers. Agreement was also excellent for the maximum SUV and the total brown fat volume (k=0.90 and 0.94, CCC=0.93 and 0.99, ICC=0.96 and 0.99), but Bland-Altman plots revealed a tendency to underestimate activity by one of the readers.
CONCLUSION: Grading the activation of brown fat by assessment of the most caudally activated depots results in excellent interreader agreement, comparable to SUV measurements.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the interreader agreement of a three-tier craniocaudal grading system for brown fat activation and investigate the accuracy of the distinction between the three grades.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After IRB approval, 340 cases were retrospectively selected from patients undergoing (18)FDG-PET/CT between 2007 and 2015 at our institution, with 85 cases in each grade and 85 controls with no active brown fat. Three readers evaluated all cases independently. Furthermore standardized uptake values (SUV) measurements were performed by two readers in a subset of 53 cases. Agreement between the readers was assessed with Cohen's Kappa (k), the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Accuracy was assessed with Bland-Altman and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. A Bonferroni-corrected two-tailed p<0.016 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Agreement for BAT grade was excellent by all three metrics with k=0.83-0.89, CCC=0.83-0.89 and ICC=0.91-0.94. Bland-Altman analysis revealed only slight average over- or underestimation (-0.01-0.14) with the majority of disagreements within one grade. ROC analysis yielded slightly less accurate classification between higher vs. lower grades (Area under the ROC curves 0.78-0.84 vs. 0.88-0.92) but no significant differences between readers. Agreement was also excellent for the maximum SUV and the total brown fat volume (k=0.90 and 0.94, CCC=0.93 and 0.99, ICC=0.96 and 0.99), but Bland-Altman plots revealed a tendency to underestimate activity by one of the readers.
CONCLUSION: Grading the activation of brown fat by assessment of the most caudally activated depots results in excellent interreader agreement, comparable to SUV measurements.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Downloads

0 downloads since deposited on 02 Aug 2017
0 downloads since 12 months

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Nuclear Medicine
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:June 2017
Deposited On:02 Aug 2017 14:02
Last Modified:19 Feb 2018 08:17
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:0720-048X
OA Status:Closed
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.03.012
PubMed ID:28629569

Download