Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the treatment of pure aortic regurgitation in native valves and failing surgical bioprostheses: results from an international registry study


Sawaya, Fadi J; Deutsch, Marcus-André; Seiffert, Moritz; Yoon, Sung-Han; Codner, Pablo; Wickramarachchi, Upul; Latib, Azeem; Petronio, A Sonia; Rodés-Cabau, Josep; Taramasso, Maurizio; Spaziano, Marco; Bosmans, Johan; Biasco, Luigi; Mylotte, Darren; Savontaus, Mikko; Gheeraert, Peter; Chan, Jason; Jørgensen, Troels H; Sievert, Horst; Mocetti, Marco; Lefèvre, Thierry; Maisano, Francesco; Mangieri, Antonio; Hildick-Smith, David; Kornowski, Ran; Makkar, Raj; Bleiziffer, Sabine; Søndergaard, Lars; De Backer, Ole (2017). Safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the treatment of pure aortic regurgitation in native valves and failing surgical bioprostheses: results from an international registry study. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 10(10):1048-1056.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of transcatheter heart valves (THV) for the treatment of noncalcific pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) and failing bioprosthetic surgical heart valves (SHVs) with pure severe aortic regurgitation (AR).
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available about the "off-label" use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to treat pure severe AR.
METHODS: The study population consisted of patients with pure severe AR treated by TAVR at 18 different centers. Study endpoints were device success, early safety, and clinical efficacy at 30 days, as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included, 78 patients in the NAVR group and 68 patients in the failing SHV group. In the NAVR group, device success, early safety, and clinical efficacy were 72%, 66%, and 61%, respectively. Device success and clinical efficacy were significantly better with newer generation THVs compared with old-generation THVs (85% vs. 54% and 75% vs. 46%, respectively, p < 0.05); this was mainly due to less second THV implantations and a lower rate of moderate to severe paravalvular regurgitation (10% vs. 24% and 3% vs. 27%, respectively). Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were body mass index <20 kg/m(2), STS surgical risk score >8%, major vascular or access complication, and moderate to severe AR. In the failing SHV group, device success, early safety, and clinical efficacy were 71%, 90%, and 77%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: TAVR for pure NAVR remains a challenging condition, with old-generation THVs being associated with THV embolization and migration and significant paravalvular regurgitation. Newer generation THVs show more promising outcomes. For those patients with severe AR due to failing SHVs, TAVR is a valuable therapeutic option.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of transcatheter heart valves (THV) for the treatment of noncalcific pure native aortic valve regurgitation (NAVR) and failing bioprosthetic surgical heart valves (SHVs) with pure severe aortic regurgitation (AR).
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available about the "off-label" use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to treat pure severe AR.
METHODS: The study population consisted of patients with pure severe AR treated by TAVR at 18 different centers. Study endpoints were device success, early safety, and clinical efficacy at 30 days, as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included, 78 patients in the NAVR group and 68 patients in the failing SHV group. In the NAVR group, device success, early safety, and clinical efficacy were 72%, 66%, and 61%, respectively. Device success and clinical efficacy were significantly better with newer generation THVs compared with old-generation THVs (85% vs. 54% and 75% vs. 46%, respectively, p < 0.05); this was mainly due to less second THV implantations and a lower rate of moderate to severe paravalvular regurgitation (10% vs. 24% and 3% vs. 27%, respectively). Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were body mass index <20 kg/m(2), STS surgical risk score >8%, major vascular or access complication, and moderate to severe AR. In the failing SHV group, device success, early safety, and clinical efficacy were 71%, 90%, and 77%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: TAVR for pure NAVR remains a challenging condition, with old-generation THVs being associated with THV embolization and migration and significant paravalvular regurgitation. Newer generation THVs show more promising outcomes. For those patients with severe AR due to failing SHVs, TAVR is a valuable therapeutic option.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
8 citations in Web of Science®
7 citations in Scopus®
7 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 13 Nov 2017
1 download since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery
04 Faculty of Medicine > Cardiocentro Ticino
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Uncontrolled Keywords:aortic regurgitation; efficacy; safety; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; valve-in-valve
Language:English
Date:22 May 2017
Deposited On:13 Nov 2017 17:08
Last Modified:19 Feb 2018 09:14
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1876-7605
OA Status:Closed
Free access at:Publisher DOI. An embargo period may apply.
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.004
PubMed ID:28521923

Download