Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Moderate as necessary: the role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts


Abou-Chadi, Tarik; Orlowski, Matthias (2016). Moderate as necessary: the role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts. The Journal of Politics, 78(3):868-881.

Abstract

This article investigates how the degree of electoral competition affects parties’ policy positions. It follows a growing body of research on party positioning in multiparty competition that regards elections as signals for parties that have to choose their positions and issue strategies. In this article we argue that previous elections provide information about the competitiveness of the upcoming election. The expected degree of electoral competition affects parties’ future policy positions since with increasing competitiveness of an election, parties have higher incentives to move toward a vote-maximizing position. However, what constitutes a vote-maximizing strategy varies between parties. While large mainstream parties have an incentive to moderate their positions, small and niche parties choose more extreme positions to distinguish themselves from their mainstream competitors. Applying a novel measure of electoral competitiveness, we find that the degree of electoral competition indeed determines parties’ policy shifts, but that this effect is moderated by party size.

Abstract

This article investigates how the degree of electoral competition affects parties’ policy positions. It follows a growing body of research on party positioning in multiparty competition that regards elections as signals for parties that have to choose their positions and issue strategies. In this article we argue that previous elections provide information about the competitiveness of the upcoming election. The expected degree of electoral competition affects parties’ future policy positions since with increasing competitiveness of an election, parties have higher incentives to move toward a vote-maximizing position. However, what constitutes a vote-maximizing strategy varies between parties. While large mainstream parties have an incentive to moderate their positions, small and niche parties choose more extreme positions to distinguish themselves from their mainstream competitors. Applying a novel measure of electoral competitiveness, we find that the degree of electoral competition indeed determines parties’ policy shifts, but that this effect is moderated by party size.

Statistics

Citations

Dimensions.ai Metrics
2 citations in Web of Science®
2 citations in Scopus®
4 citations in Microsoft Academic
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

12 downloads since deposited on 18 Dec 2017
12 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Uncontrolled Keywords:electoral competition, party competition, niche parties, small parties
Language:English
Date:2016
Deposited On:18 Dec 2017 16:02
Last Modified:02 Feb 2018 12:34
Publisher:University of Chicago Press
ISSN:0022-3816
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/685585

Download

Download PDF  'Moderate as necessary: the role of electoral competitiveness and party size in explaining parties’ policy shifts'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 458kB
View at publisher