Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Donor accountability reconsidered: aid allocation in the age of global public goods


Bagchi, Chandreyee; Castro, Paula; Michaelowa, Katharina (2016). Donor accountability reconsidered: aid allocation in the age of global public goods. CIS Working Paper 87, University of Zurich.

Abstract

Development assistance is increasingly used to fund the provision of global public goods. However, in this case, the traditional classification of donor interests and recipient needs is not appropriate for analyzing donors’ aid allocation decisions. Given the non-excludability characteristic of global public goods, aid targeting the provision of such goods should not flow to those places with the greatest needs – as assumed by the existing aid allocation literature – but to those where they can be provided most efficiently.
After explaining the theoretical rationale behind this claim, we empirically show its implication at the example of aid for climate change mitigation (a global public good): At first glance, aid for mitigation appears much more donor-interest driven than aid for adaptation (a private or local public good) or than general aid where the consideration of recipient need seems to play a greater role. The picture changes when including appropriate control variables for mitigation efficiency. As the latter is positively correlated with economic development, donors allocating their aid in line with mitigation efficiency may be wrongly accused of allocating aid in their own interest.
While the control for efficiency-related variables solves the attribution problem for individual public goods, it is difficult to conceive of appropriate controls at the aggregate level. This represents a major challenge for the aid allocation literature and implies that holding donors accountable for their overall aid portfolio will become difficult in the future.

Abstract

Development assistance is increasingly used to fund the provision of global public goods. However, in this case, the traditional classification of donor interests and recipient needs is not appropriate for analyzing donors’ aid allocation decisions. Given the non-excludability characteristic of global public goods, aid targeting the provision of such goods should not flow to those places with the greatest needs – as assumed by the existing aid allocation literature – but to those where they can be provided most efficiently.
After explaining the theoretical rationale behind this claim, we empirically show its implication at the example of aid for climate change mitigation (a global public good): At first glance, aid for mitigation appears much more donor-interest driven than aid for adaptation (a private or local public good) or than general aid where the consideration of recipient need seems to play a greater role. The picture changes when including appropriate control variables for mitigation efficiency. As the latter is positively correlated with economic development, donors allocating their aid in line with mitigation efficiency may be wrongly accused of allocating aid in their own interest.
While the control for efficiency-related variables solves the attribution problem for individual public goods, it is difficult to conceive of appropriate controls at the aggregate level. This represents a major challenge for the aid allocation literature and implies that holding donors accountable for their overall aid portfolio will become difficult in the future.

Statistics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 10 Jan 2018
1 download since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Working Paper
Communities & Collections:06 Faculty of Arts > Institute of Political Science
Dewey Decimal Classification:320 Political science
Uncontrolled Keywords:Industriestaaten, Entwicklungsländer, Entwicklungshilfe, Öffentliches Gut, Klimaänderung, Entwicklungspolitik, Klimaschutz, Vermeidungskosten
Language:English
Date:2016
Deposited On:10 Jan 2018 11:45
Last Modified:10 Jan 2018 11:55
Series Name:CIS Working Paper
Number of Pages:26
ISSN:1662-7504
Free access at:Official URL. An embargo period may apply.
Official URL:https://www.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/cis-dam/Working_Papers/Ganzes%20WP_Paula%20Castro.pdf
Related URLs:http://www.cis.ethz.ch/research/working-papers.html (Organisation)
http://www.recherche-portal.ch/ZAD:default_scope:ebi01_prod010636844 (Library Catalogue)

Download

Download PDF  'Donor accountability reconsidered: aid allocation in the age of global public goods'.
Preview
Content: Published Version
Language: English
Filetype: PDF
Size: 662kB