Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Immediate and delayed repair bond strength of a new ormocer resin restorative material as a function of mechanical and chemical surface conditioning methods


El-Askary, Farid Sabry; Salah, Maha; Anwar, Mohammed Nasser; Özcan, Mutlu (2017). Immediate and delayed repair bond strength of a new ormocer resin restorative material as a function of mechanical and chemical surface conditioning methods. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 31(3):310-326.

Abstract

This study evaluated the μ-shear repair bond strength (μSBS) of a new ormocer restorative material as a function of repair time and repair protocol. Ormocer disks (N = 140) (Admira Fusion, Voco) were prepared and divided into 14 groups: Factor 1: Bonding protocol (No Conditioning, Admira Bond, Futurabond M+, Silane/Admira bond, Silane/Futurabond M+, Ceramic repair system, Silane/Cimara bond) and Factor 2: Repair procedure time (immediate versus delayed). Each disk received two ormocer micro-cylinders. Half of the disks were repaired immediately (24 h) and the other half after six-month water storage. Shear test was run at cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Debonded specimens were evaluated for failure mode and SEM analysis was performed. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (p < 0.05). Both the repair time and the surface conditioning method showed a significant effect on the repair μSBS (MPa) of the ormocer material (p = 0.000). When immediate repair strengths were considered, all repair protocols tested reached the mean bond achieved based on oxygen-inhibited layer (10.8 ± 2.4 MPa), except. Futurabond M+(13.9 ± 3.4) and Silane/Cimara adhesives (16.3 ± 2.9) showed significantly higher μSBS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.000, respectively). For the delayed repair, non-conditioned (5 ± 1.7), showed significantly lower values compared to those of the other protocols (p < 0.05). Failure modes were predominantly adhesive type (immediate:95% and delayed:90%). No cohesive failures were observed either in the substrate or in the repair material.

Abstract

This study evaluated the μ-shear repair bond strength (μSBS) of a new ormocer restorative material as a function of repair time and repair protocol. Ormocer disks (N = 140) (Admira Fusion, Voco) were prepared and divided into 14 groups: Factor 1: Bonding protocol (No Conditioning, Admira Bond, Futurabond M+, Silane/Admira bond, Silane/Futurabond M+, Ceramic repair system, Silane/Cimara bond) and Factor 2: Repair procedure time (immediate versus delayed). Each disk received two ormocer micro-cylinders. Half of the disks were repaired immediately (24 h) and the other half after six-month water storage. Shear test was run at cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Debonded specimens were evaluated for failure mode and SEM analysis was performed. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests (p < 0.05). Both the repair time and the surface conditioning method showed a significant effect on the repair μSBS (MPa) of the ormocer material (p = 0.000). When immediate repair strengths were considered, all repair protocols tested reached the mean bond achieved based on oxygen-inhibited layer (10.8 ± 2.4 MPa), except. Futurabond M+(13.9 ± 3.4) and Silane/Cimara adhesives (16.3 ± 2.9) showed significantly higher μSBS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.000, respectively). For the delayed repair, non-conditioned (5 ± 1.7), showed significantly lower values compared to those of the other protocols (p < 0.05). Failure modes were predominantly adhesive type (immediate:95% and delayed:90%). No cohesive failures were observed either in the substrate or in the repair material.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Downloads

2 downloads since deposited on 01 Feb 2018
2 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2017
Deposited On:01 Feb 2018 14:30
Last Modified:14 Mar 2018 17:30
Publisher:Taylor & Francis
ISSN:0169-4243
Additional Information:This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology on 09.08.2016, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01694243.2016.1215012.
OA Status:Green
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1215012

Download