Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Surgical removal of a dislocated lower third molar from the condyle region: case report


Wassouf, A; Eyrich, G; Lebeda, R; Grätz, K W (2003). Surgical removal of a dislocated lower third molar from the condyle region: case report. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin SMfZ, 113(4):416-420.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Migration of dislocated lower third molar into the condylar region is quite rare. Attention should be taken to avoid condyle fracture. METHODS: 49-year-old patient had an ectopic lower left third molal in the condylar region, suffered from a submandibular and masseter space abscess. Removal of the molar via intraoral approach was chosen avoiding facial nerve branches and unnecessary scar formation. Coronoid process is removed, the tooth is separated and removed. The defect is filled with iliac cancellous bone. The coronoid process was fixed as a cover with a resorbable plate and screws (BIONX). RESULTS: Removal via intraoral approach is possible. Hypesthesia existed postoperatively, became normal later. CONCLUSION: Annual observation is strongly recommended. Intraoral approach is superior to the extraoral approach. Removal of the coronoid process minimizes the masticator forces. Separation of the tooth is essential. Filling the defect with cancellous bone accelerates the healing.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Migration of dislocated lower third molar into the condylar region is quite rare. Attention should be taken to avoid condyle fracture. METHODS: 49-year-old patient had an ectopic lower left third molal in the condylar region, suffered from a submandibular and masseter space abscess. Removal of the molar via intraoral approach was chosen avoiding facial nerve branches and unnecessary scar formation. Coronoid process is removed, the tooth is separated and removed. The defect is filled with iliac cancellous bone. The coronoid process was fixed as a cover with a resorbable plate and screws (BIONX). RESULTS: Removal via intraoral approach is possible. Hypesthesia existed postoperatively, became normal later. CONCLUSION: Annual observation is strongly recommended. Intraoral approach is superior to the extraoral approach. Removal of the coronoid process minimizes the masticator forces. Separation of the tooth is essential. Filling the defect with cancellous bone accelerates the healing.

Statistics

Citations

Altmetrics

Downloads

251 downloads since deposited on 11 Feb 2008
25 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Dental Medicine > Clinic for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:April 2003
Deposited On:11 Feb 2008 12:24
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 12:19
Publisher:Schweizerische Zahnärzte-Gesellschft
ISSN:0256-2855
Additional Information:Free full text article
Related URLs:http://www.sso.ch/index.cfm?C632D128217D48219037DE07BE68CDEB
PubMed ID:12768887

Download

Download PDF  'Surgical removal of a dislocated lower third molar from the condyle region: case report'.
Preview
Filetype: PDF
Size: 188kB