Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

Renal dimensions measured by ultrasonography in children: variations as a function of the imaging plane and patient position


Michel, S C; Forster, I; Seifert, Burkhardt; Willi, U V; Huisman, T A G M (2004). Renal dimensions measured by ultrasonography in children: variations as a function of the imaging plane and patient position. European Radiology, 14(8):1508-1512.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of patient positioning on sonographic renal measurements and to test if the patient position alters the three-dimensional shape of the kidneys. The maximum longitudinal renal length and transverse renal width and depth were measured in the supine and prone position in 100 children (200 kidneys). Age ranged from 6 months to 16 years (mean age 5 years). The results were compared for statistically significant differences. The maximum measured longitudinal renal length was statistically significantly larger in the supine than in the prone position (supine position, left: 8.0 cm; right: 7.7 cm; prone position, left: 7.9 cm, right: 7.6 cm; P<0.001). There was no statistically significant change in the transverse diameters (width and depth, P>0.001) and renal volume ( P>0.001) in the supine vs. prone positions. Our results show that position-induced reshaping of the kidneys is unlikely to be responsible for the discrepancy in maximum longitudinal renal measurements comparing supine with prone positions. Position-dependent changes in the degree of filling of the renal calyces and pelvis as well as errors in caliper distance measurements for the different scan depths (supine vs. prone) are more likely to be responsible for the encountered differences. Consequently, we recommend to add prone renal length measurements in addition to the supine measurements. In follow-up examinations, renal length measurements should only be compared that have been collected in the same patient position.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of patient positioning on sonographic renal measurements and to test if the patient position alters the three-dimensional shape of the kidneys. The maximum longitudinal renal length and transverse renal width and depth were measured in the supine and prone position in 100 children (200 kidneys). Age ranged from 6 months to 16 years (mean age 5 years). The results were compared for statistically significant differences. The maximum measured longitudinal renal length was statistically significantly larger in the supine than in the prone position (supine position, left: 8.0 cm; right: 7.7 cm; prone position, left: 7.9 cm, right: 7.6 cm; P<0.001). There was no statistically significant change in the transverse diameters (width and depth, P>0.001) and renal volume ( P>0.001) in the supine vs. prone positions. Our results show that position-induced reshaping of the kidneys is unlikely to be responsible for the discrepancy in maximum longitudinal renal measurements comparing supine with prone positions. Position-dependent changes in the degree of filling of the renal calyces and pelvis as well as errors in caliper distance measurements for the different scan depths (supine vs. prone) are more likely to be responsible for the encountered differences. Consequently, we recommend to add prone renal length measurements in addition to the supine measurements. In follow-up examinations, renal length measurements should only be compared that have been collected in the same patient position.

Statistics

Citations

13 citations in Web of Science®
16 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

1 download since deposited on 16 Jun 2009
0 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute (EBPI)
Dewey Decimal Classification:610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:2004
Deposited On:16 Jun 2009 07:26
Last Modified:06 Dec 2017 19:59
Publisher:Springer
ISSN:0938-7994
Additional Information:The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2332-2
PubMed ID:15114491

Download