Header

UZH-Logo

Maintenance Infos

First Head-to-Head Comparison of Effective Radiation Dose from Low-Dose CT with Prospective ECG-Triggering versus Invasive Coronary Angiography


Herzog, B A; Wyss, C A; Husmann, L; Gaemperli, O; Valenta, I; Treyer, V; Landmesser, U; Kaufmann, P A (2009). First Head-to-Head Comparison of Effective Radiation Dose from Low-Dose CT with Prospective ECG-Triggering versus Invasive Coronary Angiography. Heart, 95(20):1656-1661.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduction of radiation burden of multidetector CT coronary angiography (CTCA) has remained an important task. OBJECTIVES: To compare effective radiation dose of low-dose 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-triggering versus diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (CA). METHODS: Forty-two patients referred for elective invasive CA due to suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled to undergo a low-dose CTCA without calcium scoring within the same day prior to CA. Dose-area product of diagnostic invasive CA and dose-length product of CTCA were measured, converted into effective radiation dose and compared using Man-Whitney-U tests. In addition, accuracy of CTCA to detect CAD (coronary artery narrowing >/= 50%) was assessed using invasive CA as standard of reference. On an intention-to-diagnose-base all non-evaluative vessels were included in the analysis and censored as positive. RESULTS: The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 8.5 +/- 4.4mSv (range: 1.4 - 20.5mSV) for diagnostic invasive CA, and 2.1 +/- 0.7mSv (range: 1.0 - 3.3mSv) for CTCA (P<0.001). Nineteen patients (42.9%) had no CAD by invasive CA. Forty (95.2 %) patients have been correctly classified as having CAD (23/23) or no CAD (17/19). Over 97 % (551/567) of segments were evaluable. Vessel-based analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 94.2 % (CI: 0.8-1.0), 94.8% (CI: 0.9-1.0), 89.0% (CI: 0.8-1.0), 97.4% (CI: 0.9-1.0), and an accuracy of 94.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose CTCA allows evaluation of CAD with high accuracy, but significantly less effective radiation dose to patients compared to diagnostic invasive CA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reduction of radiation burden of multidetector CT coronary angiography (CTCA) has remained an important task. OBJECTIVES: To compare effective radiation dose of low-dose 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-triggering versus diagnostic invasive coronary angiography (CA). METHODS: Forty-two patients referred for elective invasive CA due to suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled to undergo a low-dose CTCA without calcium scoring within the same day prior to CA. Dose-area product of diagnostic invasive CA and dose-length product of CTCA were measured, converted into effective radiation dose and compared using Man-Whitney-U tests. In addition, accuracy of CTCA to detect CAD (coronary artery narrowing >/= 50%) was assessed using invasive CA as standard of reference. On an intention-to-diagnose-base all non-evaluative vessels were included in the analysis and censored as positive. RESULTS: The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 8.5 +/- 4.4mSv (range: 1.4 - 20.5mSV) for diagnostic invasive CA, and 2.1 +/- 0.7mSv (range: 1.0 - 3.3mSv) for CTCA (P<0.001). Nineteen patients (42.9%) had no CAD by invasive CA. Forty (95.2 %) patients have been correctly classified as having CAD (23/23) or no CAD (17/19). Over 97 % (551/567) of segments were evaluable. Vessel-based analysis revealed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 94.2 % (CI: 0.8-1.0), 94.8% (CI: 0.9-1.0), 89.0% (CI: 0.8-1.0), 97.4% (CI: 0.9-1.0), and an accuracy of 94.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose CTCA allows evaluation of CAD with high accuracy, but significantly less effective radiation dose to patients compared to diagnostic invasive CA.

Statistics

Citations

71 citations in Web of Science®
79 citations in Scopus®
Google Scholar™

Altmetrics

Downloads

47 downloads since deposited on 18 Aug 2009
4 downloads since 12 months
Detailed statistics

Additional indexing

Item Type:Journal Article, refereed, original work
Communities & Collections:04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Nuclear Medicine
04 Faculty of Medicine > Center for Integrative Human Physiology
04 Faculty of Medicine > University Hospital Zurich > Clinic for Cardiology
Dewey Decimal Classification:570 Life sciences; biology
610 Medicine & health
Language:English
Date:October 2009
Deposited On:18 Aug 2009 12:26
Last Modified:05 Apr 2016 13:19
Publisher:BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN:1355-6037
Publisher DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.162420
PubMed ID:19581273

Download

Download PDF  'First Head-to-Head Comparison of Effective Radiation Dose from Low-Dose CT with Prospective ECG-Triggering versus Invasive Coronary Angiography'.
Preview
Content: Accepted Version
Filetype: PDF
Size: 2MB
View at publisher